- 11,320
- 14,743
the tricky part would be getting them to come out of the closet.US also has over 300 million people. I'm sure we could scrounge up some really good players just by the numbers game.
the tricky part would be getting them to come out of the closet.US also has over 300 million people. I'm sure we could scrounge up some really good players just by the numbers game.
Lol, hard to grasp? You just changed your argument ! Wind it back a notch: It was stated twice by you and someone else that someone like Lebron James would dominate in this sport, which is a joke of an idea. That's all I replied to! And it IS a joke.Not sure why this is such a hard concept to grasp for you. Our players born and bred to play their respective sports, it's easy to be large and strong. The hard part is being able to properly benefit off your set of skills you get from birth. If our entire country was devoted to creating Soccer stars, they would be born and bred to play Soccer, and just like everything else we're born and bred to do (Save the world from killing themselves, freedom, make money, etc.) we'd be the best at it. Sure you can call it arrogance all you want, but you can't deny that if this country cared as much about Soccer as it did about NFL that we would be a perennial contender.
Correct."we are the best, so, by default, we would be the best".
So it's extremely hard for you to grasp. They not have a good education in whatever third world country you're from? I'd love to go into the intricacies of hypothetical situations with you, but I can tell it would go completely over your head and be a waste of time.Lol, hard to grasp? You just changed your argument ! Wind it back a notch: It was stated twice by you and someone else that someone like Lebron James would dominate in this sport, which is a joke of an idea. That's all I replied to! And it IS a joke.
By all means, talk about the fictional ideas about how much USA would dominate if you lived in an alternate universe where you put a fuck ton of effort into soccer if it helps you sleep at night. You have a large population, great! That's a start. So does the Chinese. Wait! The Chinese aren't as rich! USA wins again! God. Your argument is just "we are the best, so, by default, we would be the best". Nice. Typical poster boy for USA.
Grats bro, gg, score should've been 6-0.GG USA.
We deserved the win, but Howard was great and we missed a bit of sharpness and luck to get that goal in before the 90 minutes were over.
The US played with all their heart. Klinsmann is doing a good job and now it's just important to develop those younger talents.
Also happy we finally showed the world we can play as good as I know we can. This is the final 16, this is the moment to put your cards on the table.
![]()
Ad hominems.. and way to duck the argument. Okay.So it's extremely hard for you to grasp. They not have a good education in whatever third world country you're from? I'd love to go into the intricacies of hypothetical situations with you, but I can tell it would go completely over your head and be a waste of time.
I don't need the US to be the best at an inferior sport for me to sleep at night, in fact that's just another reason I love being American.
No.But it's also completely pointless.
That's the point to the argument that people make. Let it be pretty clear that's not the argument I made, nor did I even bring it up. I was simply representing one side of it while you were mocking the other. Like I said earlier, it doesn't bother me that the US isn't more interested in Soccer. If this game were something like the Dolphins being knocked out of the playoffs on last second touchdown after playing like shit the entire game (which happens often) I'd be beating the shit out of my punching bag and fuming with anger. Here, I just turned off the TV and went back to work.If you want to discuss the hypothetical about how USA would dominate if they uprooted their entire sporting infrastructure & went back in time several decades to compete with the rest of the world; I'm not interested. I'm sure you guys would be a hell of a lot better, that's the most obvious argument in the world. But it's also completely pointless.
Just reminding you that this is what you said. No, they almost certainly wouldn't, they're too big. The biggest world class (outfield) player the game has ever seen is Zlatan at 6'5'' 210 pounds, and he is a technical demigod. It takes insane technical skill to play soccer well with that sort of frame. As Pks said, size and raw athleticism matters a lot less in soccer than in football and basketball. I think what they do at the combine is cool, but using an event like that as a yard stick for soccer talent would be absolutely ridiculous.Yeah Lebron James and Calvin Johnson would be absolutely destroying everyone out there. But we didn't and they don't.
Zlatan is arguably more technically gifted than Messi, but he has a longer stride and a higher center of weight, which makes it impossible to do some of the things Messi does.Messi is the best player in the world at 5'5" 150 because that's what the competition allows for. If someone was the size of Adrian Peterson (probably a little less muscle/weight) and had the same technical skill as Messi, do you think he'd be a better player than Messi?
Thanks.Grats bro, gg, score should've been 6-0.
Yeah you just got knocked down the very fucking bottom of my list buddy. Eat shit and die.Thanks.
Just to prove a Euro can learn to appreciate American sports, this is me with the t-shirt I bought last month:
![]()
See you in the other Football thread!