To answer your third pointWow that Matthew Fox ending is horrid. I definitely understand going away from that. I mean, the whole 'if you have a limp the zombies ignore you' thing was dumb but it was better than that.
As a whole I thought the movie was ok but nothing special. I wouldn't call it bad, but I wouldn't call it good either.
Some observations:
-Can someone explain to me how the outbreak in the B Wing of the WHO building started? They show that security camera footage of one of the docs working with blood samples suddenly turning right? Didn't they establish pretty clearly that it's only bites that do it? And then all the other docs suddenly turn which makes you think it's airborne even though up to that point in the movie that obviously wasn't the case. But if it was, why didn't Pitt turn after walking into those labs? I'm seriously not trying to be critical here I think I must have missed something.
PG-13 broI just thought of this too.. did the zombies even show physically on their bodies where they were bitten? I mean... I can't recall seeing any parts of their bodies being damaged
Thanks. That makes a bit more sense. I still got the impression that the dudes were just kind of randomly turning from the security footage, but it can be explained your way well enough.
The entire movie essentially falls under this rubric. A lack of logical coherence is an inherent part of the script, and was not something that occurred post production. The script writers were possessed of such little creativity that the only way they could think to move the film forward was through the introduction of gimmicks.Yeah I understand the explanation now it just still seems like there are some gaps there. One doctor is the cause of the spread among 80 employees. Yet they're all just standing in their normal labs behind closed doors. It just seemed poorly planned out, but that could probably be explained by the fact that it was shot way after the fact.