Djay
Trakanon Raider
- 2,307
- 359
Oh...cool. I take it back then...I'm sure he had his reasons.
Oh...cool. I take it back then...I'm sure he had his reasons.
You spelled neutral wrong. I'm sorry I hurt you - If you want to talk about it pm me. I'm here for you.Man that's some tricky shit there, someone gave you a net to offset Springcocks nuetral rep. (can't neg you since his Rep Power is zero)
Also, apparently you can't attach an image to rep, I tried to put that AP shirt in his rep.
"Cool home made shirts faggot." Thanks for the NEUTRAL rep bro, wanna hug it out?You spelled neutral wrong. I'm sorry I hurt you - If you want to talk about it pm me. I'm here for you.
Fucking looooooool at Wilfork thinking he can be a QB. Dude gets fatter every time I see him, and hasn't lost a step. Must be drinking the blood of high school football players.
Crazy that it's possible but I don't see Seattle losing out and the Bears have Arizona and Detroit (although it is the Bears so who knows they could blow one of those games). Crazy scenario though if the 3 NFC East teams finish the way you stated and Dallas takes the division based on 1 game better record against common opponents while having 1 game worse record within the conference. I think it's more likely Skins and Dallas both win next week and Week 17 game will be winner take all for NFC East.There's an entirely possible scenario where all 3 NFC East teams make the playoffs at 9-7.
Skins beat the Eagles/Loses to Dallas, Dallas loses to Saints/beats Skins, Giants lose to Baltimore/beat the Eagles.
Then the Bears and Seahawks have to end up 9-7.
Dallas wins NFC East, and Bears/Seahawks don't have tiebreakers over the 9-7 Skins and Giants.