2023-2024 NFL Season : Arizona's QB Search Continues
- Thread starter Animosity
- Start date
- 1,325
- 1,701
Why didn't someone shoot his worthless -non superbowl winning- needing to grow up ass. Also wtf is a TSP crew I don't speak jibber - jabber.
Kaines
Potato Supreme
- 16,853
- 45,918
Putin has already inquired about a prisoner exchange for another arms dealers.
- 1
Id hate to be on this guys team. This dudes attitude is fucking horrid. Feel like he is going to make one hell of an awful teammate.
- 3
Kaines
Potato Supreme
- 16,853
- 45,918
Best news I've ready all day. I hope Dak is done in Dallas after this year.
Animosity
Bronze Baronet of the Realm
- 6,500
- 5,494
jooka
marco esquandolas
- 14,409
- 6,123
evidently the change they are gonna propose will be to make no distinction between the quarterback being in the pocket or out of the pocket as there is now. So the QB will only have to get the ball back to the line of scrimmage to avoid a grounding penalty. Big ass fucking lame as fuck change if it passes.
- 3
Kobayashi
Vyemm Raider
- 563
- 1,269
Dumb. If anything, there should be way more grounding penalties. Just make the QBs wear a red jersey and a flag at this point.
- 3
- 1
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,921
- 14,824
The reasoning for not addressing the fumble touchback is dumb. Most fumbles are from poor techniques. The issue is that the touchback fumble is way more punitive for no great reason. It being rare shouldn't matter, either.
- 2
- 2
- 1
Kirun
Buzzfeed Editor
- 18,680
- 34,794
We're also banning another type of tackle. I could definitely foresee a flag situation within 10 years, especially if one of their "darlings" like Mahomes gets hurt.
- 1
Regime
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
- 16,418
- 37,792
Kirun
Buzzfeed Editor
- 18,680
- 34,794
Kobayashi
Vyemm Raider
- 563
- 1,269
I feel like they don't look as closely at the ball making it back to the line of scrimmage as they should. I think they're also a bit generous at times with the eligible receiver in the area rule. Conversely, I also recall a few plays this year where they called it on what appeared to be a miscommunication between the wr/qb where there wasn't really any pressure. Overall, I don't think there really needed to be a change other than maybe making it a reviewable call.
Hoss
Make America's Team Great Again
- 25,538
- 12,024
On the surface I like that they're making no distinction between in the pocket and out of the pocket .... but I want it to go the other way. Intentional grounding no matter where you are in the backfield. It's sort of a bullshit penalty right now anyway. It's the same as a sack except no one gets credit for it. So if you're going down anyway, just fucking ground it. You admit the defense won that play and take your painless sack like a fucking pussy. If anything changes it should be to give the closest defensive player credit for the sack.
What would be really fun is if It carried a loss of yardage or was considered a live ball until the second bounce.
- 1
Merrith
Golden Baronet of the Realm
- 18,105
- 6,921
Other than a few really bad versions of it. I remember Josh Allen getting flagged where it was clearly an option route for his receiver, and they just had different ideas about whether he should continue the deeper option or cut the route off. He wasn't even directly under pressure.
- 1