OneofOne said:
No, I was talking to Iz. Some tax people get in the rut of "must present client with lowest tax bill possible" to justify themselves/feel they are doing their job, while on the other hand the client"s biggest concern is they want to make money (that is after all why you are in business). It might feel counter-intuitive to say those two needs sometime oppose each other, but they in fact do. Often time paying a higher tax % is a GOOD thing - it means you are making bank.
I"m just pointing out that going for the lowest tax bill possible isn"t always the awesome thing some people think it is.
You are correct, it"s not always better. But it"s also not always better to be debt free. In your previous post, you mentioned clients buying things they didn"t need. Well, of course then that"s a waste of money.
However, given a choice of paying Uncle Sam more of your money for taxes, so it can go to God-knows-what pork barrel project, vs. using that same money and expanding your business.....well, the latter choice is often the better route. You can often buy hard assets also (equipment, office buildings, etc), which can have sustained value.
Again, it depends on the individual situation. Look at Cutlery"s example of a 30% tax bill on $500,000 (so $150,000) vs 50% tax bill on $1,000,000 (so $500,000).
In the first example, you would take home $350,000, and pay $150,000 in taxes. In the second, you would take home $500,000, and pay $500,000 in taxes. (The difference in taxes is $350,000).
You might say "well, isn"t it better to take home $500,000 vs $350,000"? Sure, in a basic sense. However, if you had spent that $350,000 difference in taxes on your business......how much better off might you be? What if you increased your employee"s salaries with it so they work harder and/or stay loyal to your company? What if you used it to purchase an office building so you don"t have to be a slave to a lease anymore and you can build equity on that property just like you would your house? Maybe you could even rent out space and make money!
So even though you think you would make more had you taken home $500,000 instead of $350,000.....in actuality you might have made more money long term had you invested more money into your business. Again, it all depends on what you are spending money on. Make smart investments to expand your business, not "buy shit they don"t need".
Also, once you get into making serious money, you will find the difference between something like $500,000 and $350,000 isn"t that great. Honestly, how much money do you need to live well? Above a certain point it"s all gravy, unless you are one of these Chad Johnson idiots that buys a $300,000 car without knowing when their next paycheck is coming. I"m already putting away like 60-70% of my income towards retirement. If I took home any more money, it"s just going to go towards retirement, ie. investments.....so why not invest more in my companies and my employees?
EDIT: and just to address your own example:
OneofOne said:
IE if you end up paying $5k in financing and assorted costs to purchase an additional work vehicle with debt, but it only saves you an additional $1k of taxes... Why did you just do that?
Because now you have another work vehicle and hopefully you"ve done the research to see how much that car will expand your business. Hopefully this work vehicle will increase your overall revenue, maybe you will even hire another employee to drive this vehicle. So not only did you save a little on taxes, but you will be increasing your future earnings.....and isn"t that better than giving that same money to the government?