Shonuff
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 5,538
- 791
Maybe I haven"t made this clear, but the seller does base pricing on the customer"s neighborhood, job and age. If someone lives on a country club where the home prices are a million+, and they pay $30k a year to live on that country club, they get charged more. He won"t negotiate price with a customer once he gives them a price (which could be an opportunity for me given that we net $1 out of $2), but he does price discriminate.rinthea said:Great read Lyrical and everyone.
So Lyrical, most of your business pretty much comes from word of mouth referrals and repeat business and now you"ve gone and changed your charge structure from something consistent to something discriminatory by padding that guys bid.
The way you"ve done it seems like a short term decision that could bite you in the arse to me. Discriminatory pricing as a way to pick up the consumer surplass works great if you are a monopoly when it cant effect future business (or if the product can"t be resold, which u dont have this problem I"m assuming) OR if you ADD VALUE. But if you arent a monopoly and not currently adding value, and if the customer or his referrals can do without your product its probably a bad idea to pad bids. Especially since you want future business originating from the client.
I haven"t really changed how the seller prices things out. He actually came up with the bid himself. I asked him if it was too high, and he said he always bids this customer at $300+ an hour, and they always accept it. This particular job was bid at about $310 an hour, and the customer gave us the go ahead to do it (we did it today). The seller"s had some of the wealthier customers for years - and this customer amounts to about 40K a year in sales (or about $2k a month in profit to me).
The seller has pretty much done discriminatory pricing for the last 45 years. We have three buckets of clients: the middle class, the people in upper middle class/upper class, and the wealthiest 1%. They all have different pricing criteria. The middle class care about mostly price, but also want the job done right/on their time schedule/fully insured. The upper middle cass/upper class care a little about price, and more about having the job done right/on their time schedule/fully insured. The wealthiest 1% don"t care about price, but want it done right/on their time schedule/fully insured. So as we move up the income scale, we tend to charge more. We might bill a middle class customer at $150-175 an hour. The next group is at $225-250 an hour. And the wealthiest 1%, we bill at $300+ an hour.
The funny thing is that the wealthy people tend to not bitch about price, and are more apt to sign up for the job right then and there. The middle class is the group that tends to take a week and try to negotiate $50.
As far as where we add value, none of the competitors are fully insured. We pay out in insurance in a year as much as Doctors do for the business. None of our competitors have equipment like we do: our equipment ranges from $50K-100K apiece for the heavy stuff. The wealthier people tend to want a variety of stuff done, and the other 29 competitors aren"t equipped to do it. We are the largest, and our competition regularly sends us business for the stuff they can"t do. The wealthier people don"t want three businesses doing what they want done, they want one. Finally, these rich people want stuff done according to their schedule. They place a premium on being in control, and once they make a decision, they want it done ASAP. If there is a six week backlog, they don"t care, they want it done tomorrow. That"s fine - we"ll bump other people for you, but we want $300+ an hour. They pay for a sort of "VIP" treatment. Once of the guys that has thousands of acres told the seller that for wht he pays the seller, that he expected to be ahead of people paying less per hour and only getting work done once a year (or two). And since the "Big fish" are usually worth a day"s work and use us every month (versus your average middle class customer that might use you once every two years and ley you bill two hours), we will cater to you.
If anything, the seller follows textbook Discriminatory Pricing that we are taught in MicroEcon 101. I was taught that Discriminatory Pricing is the best way to make profits. We charge customers ccording to their budget. If the customer is in a poor area, and in a house that is 100K, and needs just the bare minimum, we charge as low as possible. We realize that with this type of customer, we are competing against smaller landscaping companies with no staff, overhead, insurance and equipment. It"s hard to get past $150-175 an hour on these people. But if we pull up to guy that lives in the most expensive country club in the state (we do a lot of business there), we charge more, because you have to be loaded to be a member there, and the homes are a million bucks.
We try to charge what each customer is willing to pay, but we don"t go to the people that want us to do less than an hour. The seller has done this for the last 45 years, and his customers are trained this way. When I asked the seller about why he should charge some of the guys that have millions and millions less than $300 an hour, he said that they"ve used him for years, and they are used to being billed this way.
Its kind of neat to see the economic principle of Price Discrimination (as a way to maximize profits) at work in real life.
I want more middle class customers, as there are more of them. They might want to argue over $50, but you can make that up in volume. Right now, I think that 50% of our customers are middle class, and the other 50% make 80K, 150K and 500K+ a year. The customer base is skwed more towards high-end customers. While the middle class customer might pay less, you can make a decent buck on them with efficient work scheduling.