That's why there is a mecha rhino. If you notice they also showed Doc Ocs arms, and Vultures Wings.
You quoted him saying those things were there, and then pointed out those things were there. Not sure what context I'm missing here. And it was just a mildly amusing little observance. Certainly at least a little out of context, my bad if that sanded your tampon.Grimmlok is the shining example of you can take anything out of context ,and spin it to anything that you want
post the original quote dumbass
On the topic of creating super villains in ultimate spiderman.
Bingo. If you look at 1:20 of the trailer you can see there are 6 doors opening, so they might be going with that angle from the get go. OSCORP creating the 6 and this movie we'll see the first half and then in 3 we'll see the full team together.So Sinister 6 will probly happen in Spiderman 3.
First one was decent and a better Spider-Man than the first three. Oh and I've been a Spider-Man fan, collector since 1977.The first one was shit and I would expect this one to also be shit.
They are bringing in these guys for The Sinister Six in the next or fourth movie. At least there is some kind of tie in and not just having random villian #1, #2 and #3.Hey lets add 3 villains to the movie! That worked great for "Spiderman 3", right???
Holy fuck.
You are the people who baffle me. To see that Peter Parker who is a complete douchebag asshole and not clever in any way and go "Yep, nailed it!" just confounds me.First one was decent and a better Spider-Man than the first three. Oh and I've been a Spider-Man fan, collector since 1977.
1 - Amazing Spider-Man is more similar to Ultimate Spider-Man than Earth 616 Spider-Man.You are the people who baffle me. To see that Peter Parker who is a complete douchebag asshole and not clever in any way and go "Yep, nailed it!" just confounds me.
Had this argument before though so not going to keep dragging it out, sorry for soing it this much.
It was definitely a rush job to make sure they held the franchise but I agree, other than the crane scene, the rest was decent and enjoyable.Other than the crane scene, everything in costume was great, movement and fighting style were damn near perfect. The problem is they had to toss a story in and it was painful to watch. It wasn't Spider-man 3 bad but it was fucking trying.
I had low expectations for this but I'm starting to think it might be good which means it will be "punch myself in the dick" terrible.
I see your taste in movies is the same as women, where it's immature, erratic and mind numbingly stupid but might look attractive physically.First one was awesome and way better than the original trilogy.
Pretty much.I see your taste in movies is the same as women, where it's immature, erratic and mind numbingly stupid but might look attractive physically.
So long as they dont fuck it up like the abortion that should have been SM3.Venom easter egg:
In the sequence where you see the Oscorp computer file tree, there are a handful of interesting things. Weapons, plutonium, nano drugs, synthetic plant, Ravencroft Institute.and at least two slots that I can see for "Venom Storage."
viaThe Amazing Spider-Man 2: Venom, Mary Jane and Other Easter Eggs We Missed | Comicbook.com
Edit: Internet searching seems to indicate:
Venom's symbiote is revealed during the post-credits scene
Spiderman is not all noble like Superman, he was always a smart ass. Sure he may not be as clever as he is in the comics but what the fuck did Tobey bring?You are the people who baffle me. To see that Peter Parker who is a complete douchebag asshole and not clever in any way and go "Yep, nailed it!" just confounds me.