Azrayne
Irenicus did nothing wrong
Overrated might be the wrong word (I have to admit I haven't checked out Sandman), I just think people (and I'm speaking generally here, not about you guys in particular) play him up as some kind of amazing visionary figure of modern fantasy while totally ignoring the fact that his writing often has significant flaws.
That's not a big deal, all authors have flaws, but for some reason it seems when it comes to Gaiman people would rather just put the guy on a pedestal than consider the issue. The image he projects of the soft spoken, thoughtful, romantic british writer is probably a contributing factor - he comes across not only as a great guy, but like he should be a perfect fantasy author.
As for the blank slate thing - imo it's not so much that he's playing the "straight man" role as that he just doesn't seem fleshed out enough in terms of background, and particular in terms of emotional landscape and internal dialogue, to feel like a real person. It's a lot like that scene in the Red Letter Media review of Phantom Menace where Plinkett asks a bunch of people to define the characters without referring to their appearance or actions, and they're left stumped. Some fictional characters feel like real people, someone you could bump into and recognize walking down the street, even outside of the settings they're written into. Shadow (and the protagonist of Neverwhere, and to a lesser extent Stardust) doesn't.
I still think AG is a great book, and that this series looks like it has potential, but it's always seemed glaringly obvious to me that Gaiman just can't nail down a realistic protagonist, and I've never figured out whether it's just me or whether people just don't like criticizing the guy.
That's not a big deal, all authors have flaws, but for some reason it seems when it comes to Gaiman people would rather just put the guy on a pedestal than consider the issue. The image he projects of the soft spoken, thoughtful, romantic british writer is probably a contributing factor - he comes across not only as a great guy, but like he should be a perfect fantasy author.
As for the blank slate thing - imo it's not so much that he's playing the "straight man" role as that he just doesn't seem fleshed out enough in terms of background, and particular in terms of emotional landscape and internal dialogue, to feel like a real person. It's a lot like that scene in the Red Letter Media review of Phantom Menace where Plinkett asks a bunch of people to define the characters without referring to their appearance or actions, and they're left stumped. Some fictional characters feel like real people, someone you could bump into and recognize walking down the street, even outside of the settings they're written into. Shadow (and the protagonist of Neverwhere, and to a lesser extent Stardust) doesn't.
The example that always sticks in my head is the whole subplot with his wife. He just seems kind of "oh ok" when his dead wife pops up and starts appearing in his life, instead of having a realistic emotional reaction.
I still think AG is a great book, and that this series looks like it has potential, but it's always seemed glaringly obvious to me that Gaiman just can't nail down a realistic protagonist, and I've never figured out whether it's just me or whether people just don't like criticizing the guy.
Last edited: