I will just wait until later to watch this. I only go to see kick ass(Not the actual movies named Kickass) movies in theaters.../wave Maverick.
high frame rates (interpolated or otherwise) usually cause the soap opera effect in my experience, so I'm confused by this comment. The Hobbit in 48fps was awful (the movies were awful obviously, but 48fps sucked for film)Saw it in a laser 3D high frame rate etc. brand new theater and the visuals were amazing. I think the high frame rate helped the 3D effect considerably as it felt 'real' and not 'soap opera' ish.
As to the plot ...
...
The visuals were amazing.
the high frame rate on the hobbit was awful.high frame rates (interpolated or otherwise) usually cause the soap opera effect in my experience, so I'm confused by this comment. The Hobbit in 48fps was awful (the movies were awful obviously, but 48fps sucked for film)
high frame rates (interpolated or otherwise) usually cause the soap opera effect in my experience, so I'm confused by this comment. The Hobbit in 48fps was awful (the movies were awful obviously, but 48fps sucked for film)
$17 million preshows. Not spectacular but most people didn't see it doing comic book levels for preshows. Similar to the last Jurassic Park film which made $145 million in the first weekend.
Some showings started at 3pm, fwiw. Aside from the long runtime, these types of movies just don't tend to have that younger audience that is more invested in being the very first.With the exception of endgame, 3 hour movies tend to not have big thursday's, because they only get 1 or 2 showings per screen, not 3.
This movie will certainly be a movie that does money over time (like the original), especially because people will be willing to wait to see it in a premium screen, if tickets sales for this weekend are any indication. Its basically impossible to get a ticket to the Dolby or fake Imax at my local AMC, but the normal theaters are pretty empty.
I agree. Watching HFR Hobbit (first one) turned me completely off of it. I haven't tried ever since because it was SO bad.the high frame rate on the hobbit was awful.
The humans returning was fun and apocalyptic for the Na'vi and the last hour was James Cameron showing everyone how much better at action he is than everyone else,
I read on The Hyperbole Piccune that it's expected to gross 750 million opening weekend.
This is a key selling point for the higher frame rate. It helps to eliminate the 'tinfoil in a blender' sensation that dominated the Bayformers movies what with every frame ending up kinda blurry due to the extent and speed of what was being displayed on the screen & tracked by a moving viewpoint.The action in this movie puts pretty much any blockbuster since the last Avatar to shame. It is very easy to track who is doing what to whom and how nature is murdering the humans. There was even CGI action in daytime! Granted the climax of the climax happens under darkness, but that actually felt like a story beat for Avatar 3 and the lighting was still really good.
Someone mentioned everything being too clean as a negative, and maybe it is in the non-action scenes, but for the action scenes, the clean visuals and incredible lighting remove any muddiness we usually get for a high-CGI fight from any other recent movie.
Its been said a million times already, and will be said more I'm sure, but the plot is basically as simple as the first one (just with more eyes on leaving things open for Avatars 3-6), but if you have any interest in the movie at all, you would be doing yourself a disservice to not see it on the biggest, best screen you can find.