Avatar Bet Welcher/Non-Donor

a_skeleton_03 · Jan 25, 2017

Ambiturner said:
Seriously? You wrote this shit shouldn't you know it?

12.) Moderator actions are final after the first appeal is denied by a majority moderator decision. There is no escalation after moderators.

So what rule was followed when

Cad banned him then?

You have to follow the rules first in order for them to be protected.

Cad · Jan 25, 2017

Ambiturner said:
Seriously? You wrote this shit shouldn't you know it?

12.) Moderator actions are final after the first appeal is denied by a majority moderator decision. There is no escalation after moderators.

12b: unless it would be funnier and more trollolol to arbitrarily overrule the moderators in which case these rules mean nothing and I'll do what I want

Fixed!

hodj · Jan 25, 2017

Mario Speedwagon said:
The only thing I've learned from this and the @Convo situation is that apparently everyone that regularly posts in the NFL thread has a personality disorder or learning disability.

Well, see, there's a reason for that. Football is actually the gayest sport. You have a bunch of sweaty dude who group up in a huddle, smack each other on the asses, and pass balls between their legs so they can make a pass and score.

Fucking gay as fuck. Football is the gayest sport. So it attracts faggots, autists and sociopaths.

Mario Speedwagon · Jan 25, 2017

Ambiturner said:
Seriously? You wrote this shit shouldn't you know it?

12.) Moderator actions are final after the first appeal is denied by a majority moderator decision. There is no escalation after moderators.

You realize that if you apply the rules like this, then you are giving mods the power to basically ban anyone for anyone reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it right? I mean a banned user cannot appeal. Uber was flat banned for not breaking any written rule. Is this what you want?

Cad · Jan 25, 2017

Mario Speedwagon said:
You realize that if you apply the rules like this, then you are giving mods the power to basically ban anyone for anyone reason and there is nothing anyone can do about it right? I mean a banned user cannot appeal. Uber was flat banned for not breaking any written rule. Is this what you want?

All he would have had to do was ask us to vote. We would have. Maybe it would have been overturned, since I'm sure you and AG would have voted against it and since a_skeleton_03 demodded Tuco he's the tiebreaker.

But he didn't, he just got bought off and undid it. No big deal, it's his forum. Just funny how he's a stickler for the rules except when it comes to him.

hodj · Jan 25, 2017

Mario Speedwagon said:
Uber was flat banned for not breaking any written rule. Is this what you want?

Yes for Tanoomba.

No for everyone else.

Ambiturner · Jan 25, 2017

a_skeleton_03 said:
So what rule was followed when Cad banned him then?

The rule that whoever received the most votes would be @Amod

That's exactly what they're elected for. They use their discretion and if they fuck it up then the other mods over turn it. If they all fuck up we clean house and get new ones.

Daezuel · Jan 25, 2017

Dude welched on a $100 bet WHILE A MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY. Who gives a flying fuck what board it happened on.

Then he fucking created a new account and spent the next 6 years lying about it.

He paid up and is now unbanned, that is fair. I don't think this means he shouldn't be punished though for the boldfaced lies in this and other threads when confronted about it.

Cad · Jan 25, 2017

jihodj said:
Yes for Tanoomba.

No for everyone else.

And remember it was a_skeleton_03 who flat banned Tanoomba in the first place, despite there being no rule allowing such bans (and a_skeleton_03 not being a moderator). Then unbanned him several months later also for apparently no reason.

BUT THE RULES.

MUH RULES.

VERY IMPORTANT.

Daezuel · Jan 25, 2017

BTW, it's not a fucking punishment to have to pay a debt you have fucking owed for 6 years.

Mario Speedwagon · Jan 25, 2017

Daezuel said:
Dude welched on a $100 bet WHILE A MEMBER OF THIS COMMUNITY. Who gives a flying fuck what board it happened on.

Then he fucking created a new account and spent the next 6 years lying about it.

He paid up and is now unbanned, that is fair. I don't think this means he shouldn't be punished though for the boldfaced lies in this and other threads when confronted about it.

Being a lying shitbag is not an infractable offense as far as I'm concerned.

hodj · Jan 25, 2017

Cad said:
And remember it was a_skeleton_03 who flat banned Tanoomba in the first place, despite there being no rule allowing such bans (and a_skeleton_03 not being a moderator). Then unbanned him several months later also for apparently no reason.

BUT THE RULES.

MUH RULES.

VERY IMPORTANT.

Yeah the only problem I have with any of that was him unbanning that faggot.

We have every reason in the world to ban Tanoomba. He's a faggot, a shitty poster, and a terrible human being that contributes nothing to this forum. That was the right call.

Uber Uberest · Jan 25, 2017

GAIZ HE LIED!

Cad · Jan 25, 2017

jihodj said:
Yeah the only problem I have with any of that was him unbanning that faggot.

We have every reason in the world to ban Tanoomba. He's a faggot, a shitty poster, and a terrible human being that contributes nothing to this forum. That was the right call.

Of course it was. And nobody cared.

But when it's a_skeleton_03 and his facebook troll friend, GUYZ, DA RUELZ.

hodj · Jan 25, 2017

a_skeleton_03 is an interesting fellow. I like him. He hasn't revealed my doxx to people, but I know he has them by now. Except you can't see my facebook wall if you don't follow me, and I've only ever made one post on twitter, so there really isn't much to suss out there that everyone doesn't already know.

But yes, this current troll of his is shallow and pedantic.

a_skeleton_03 · Jan 25, 2017

Cad said:
And remember it was a_skeleton_03 who flat banned Tanoomba in the first place, despite there being no rule allowing such bans (and a_skeleton_03 not being a moderator). Then unbanned him several months later also for apparently no reason.

BUT THE RULES.

MUH RULES.

VERY IMPORTANT.

Complains I don't follow the rules then makes fun of me for following the rules. Just Cad things.

Daezuel · Jan 25, 2017

Mario Speedwagon said:
Being a lying shitbag is not an infractable offense as far as I'm concerned.

You don't think it's infractable. Interesting. Several members and mods spent time tracking down the truth behind his lies, wasting our time, all the while Uber was a dickbag about the entire thing.

Get back to me the next time Uber makes a good post.

a_skeleton_03 · Jan 25, 2017

Daezuel said:
You don't think it's infractable. Interesting. Several members and mods spent time tracking down the truth behind his lies, wasting our time, all the while Uber was a dickbag about the entire thing.

Get back to me the next time Uber makes a good post.

So report his posts.

He isn't protected in any way.

Uber Uberest · Jan 25, 2017

Daezuel said:
You don't think it's infractable. Interesting. Several members and mods spent time tracking down the truth behind his lies, wasting our time, all the while Uber was a dickbag about the entire thing.

Get back to me the next time Uber makes a good post.

Hahaha this is gold! Sweet life you have. 3-0 Uber

Cad · Jan 25, 2017

a_skeleton_03 said:
So report his posts.

He isn't protected in any way.

Yes report his posts so he can get RRP'd then a_skeleton_03 can overturn it again for more drama!

Search

Avatar Bet Welcher/Non-Donor

a_skeleton_03

Cad

scientia potentia est

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition

Cad

scientia potentia est

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider

Daezuel

Potato del Grande

Cad

scientia potentia est

Daezuel

Potato del Grande

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi

Uber Uberest

rdr^2

Cad

scientia potentia est

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi

a_skeleton_03

Daezuel

Potato del Grande

a_skeleton_03

Uber Uberest

rdr^2

Cad

scientia potentia est