Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
Funny enough, IW has a lot of the same issues people criticised about the Last Jedi: subverion of fan expectations, Iron Man armour going full Mary Sue, beloved characters going against their established character, long side-quests that resolve nothing. Heroic sacrifice subverted that resolves nothing. Etc.. But they packaged it btter, I assume.
Subverting expectations is not an "issue" unless its done poorly. Its the same as any other device used in movies or story telling, if you do it well, its actually a benefit, if you do it lazily or poorly its terrible. Last Jedi's subversion fell flat because it ran counter to what the audience expected in the bigger Universe, in order to subvert what they expected in the film itself--as I said when it came out, if the Last Jedi had been simply the second of three movies it would have been a damn good film, but when you step back and look at ALL the movies in the Universe its dog shit. Marvel's subversion worked not only in the film, but also in the universe--every single one flowed well with what we've come to know throughout the Universe we've seen. A lot of the twists people didn't expect but when we saw them we understood not onlyCOULD it have happened that way but it was REASONABLE for it to happen that way--which was the big difference between TLJ and this. (For example, when Rey masters the force better than any other Jedi with zero training, that might have worked if the audience had never seen any other Jedis come of age, we could assume she was like some mythical hero. Unfortunately, we did see those things in other movies, and subverting this expectation in this way fell completely, and totally flat, because it was something unreasonable compared to everything we know about how Jedi's powers work, and we had ZERO explanation for why they are working differently for Rey.)
Iron Man armor going Mary Sue? Not sure what you mean with that. As for characters going against their established character? Again, not sure what you mean. But it comes down to reasonable and unreasonable. Having the scion of hope, the guy who believed in the good of people so much that he chose to throw down his weapon against the man that killed his adopted parents, his beloved teacher and was actively helping to kill his friends, because of the glimmer of hope he might be redeemed...To have that man all the sudden think of killing an innocent child, his nephew no less, because "he was scared" of the future? Is going against your character at a whole different level, its completely destroying what the character was. But having a character go from say, being selfish, to learning the meaning of Christmas and being selfless? That's just character growth; it still requires going against the old character but its done in a reasonable way with plenty of evidence as to WHY the change happened, something severely lacking in every "subversion" in TLJ (Which was the main problem, none of them made sense, we were told to simply accept them rather than seeing why things were working so differently compared to past movies.)
And that's the difference. Informing your audience so something is unexpected, but also reasonable. A good subversion has the same properties as a really good joke--it tickles the same part of the brain, which is why we enjoy them ...Because you EXPECT one thing, but then get another but the thing you GOT makes even more sense, just not in a way you originally expected (And this is really difficult to do to an engine like the brain which lives and breathes prediction.)
As for the side quest, that just comes from annoyance--a side quest to get something is fine if you've used your time well so that everything in the rest of the scenes make sense and you want more time for X characters or you want to set something up for the future. The issue in TLJ was not the side quest, it was the side quest happening and taking 40 minutes of screen time when Luke, a beloved character, couldn't even be given 30 seconds of screen time to illustrate how his ENTIRE character was now the fundamental OPPOSITE of what he used to be. That's why the Thor's hammer side quest worked, and the TLJ side quest sucked. Because in TLJ everyone felt like a lot of very very important explanations were glossed over to bloat the film with something superfluous, like dumping extra icing on a cake to cover up the fact that you forgot to add sugar to it. Meanwhile, in Thor, the side quest felt like a bonus, everything else was explained well, so the side quest was just...icing on the cake.
Last edited:
- 1