Royal
Connoisseur of Exotic Pictures
Yes you're right. I can't believe I forgot that one.I agree with you that it was somewhat necessary to establish this wasn't Nolan's Batman, but casino royale was a reboot.
Yes you're right. I can't believe I forgot that one.I agree with you that it was somewhat necessary to establish this wasn't Nolan's Batman, but casino royale was a reboot.
Tanking? Is that a typo for taking? It's hardly tanking - yet. Yes, it had higher weekend day drop numbers than other super hero films, but you can't just look at that percentage in a vacuum, since it had an $82 million opening day.This movie is so fucking weird. It's tanking in money right now, and people keep waving around the RT audience score like it's not that bad.
Deadpool took in more money on its first Sunday and Monday than BvS. It is not looking great for the long term earning capacity of BvS.Tanking? Is that a typo for taking? It's hardly tanking - yet. Yes, it had higher weekend day drop numbers than other super hero films, but you can't just look at that percentage in a vacuum, since it had an $82 million opening day.
Yea, it had a good opening weekend, largely due to presales. As of the end of the weekend, it's earnings had dropped substantially and it's audience reviews have gone from 84% to 72%.Tanking? Is that a typo for taking? It's hardly tanking - yet. Yes, it had higher weekend day drop numbers than other super hero films, but you can't just look at that percentage in a vacuum, since it had an $82 million opening day.
He's working on another Clerks so there ya go.Kevin Smith needs to go back to making movies with pussy ,and cock jokes. That is all that dude is good at.
I pity the worldHe's working on another Clerks so there ya go.
Casino Royalewas, in fact, a reboot: The opening ofCasino Royalewas him getting his second kill necessary to receive his 00-status. Also, since Daniel Craig began as Bond, the franchise has effectively been serialized, with returning characters, effects of deaths and situations lasting from movie to movie, etc.The Bond franchise has never been rebooted and none of them have ever shown Bond as anything other than an expert, fully trained agent anyway. They don't employ serial storytelling either beyond a few recurring characters apart from Bond himself.
You certainly don't have to do a reboot just because of a lead actor changing. The original Batman movies went from Keaton to Kilmer to Clooney without doing so. But if you do reboot an established cinematic character whose previous incarnation is still very much in the public consciousness, then clearly signaling the do-over prevents confusion for the more casual audience.
A freakishly bizarre dream sequence and several minutes of protagonists watching YouTube videos beg to differ.It doesn't matter how much in the zeitgeist the story is now, or how well known the origin is today; these films are being made to stand alone for all time.
It's actually another Mall Rats, and it's being filmed right by my house in the Exton Mall!He's working on another Clerks so there ya go.
I disagree. They did an entire TV show about his origin. That's just as accessible as the movies even if you want to slip that detail under the carpet. The stories (both of them) have been beaten to death more than ANY origin story. We'd need another 2-3 wolverine origins to catch up. Fuck.Well Superman's origin has only been shown in detail twice in 35 years for the movies so they haven't overkilled that one. Hopefully WB doesn't bungle the DCCU enough to even consider needing to show it again.