BB.com Misc Refugee Thread

Cleveland said:

dude is hilarious and now we have an opening for the thread drunk

Click to expand...

He'll ruin our great reputation on this forum

Kimm4 said:

I don't know I guess we'll have to wait and see. Like I said, he's a completely different person when he's not posting there...very calm/chill super nice. Since newmisc a lot of the people who posted in the OG misc have changed in the way they post. So many of them have become nasty af...like they're all trying so hard to fit in...does anyone here know what I mean? I'm the same Kim I've always been which is why I don't enjoy being there...it's just not for me...

Click to expand...

I don't really see the normal miscers posting that kind of stuff there. I just think that the overwhelming majority of the posters there are the trolls/incels and plus tons of alts. I looked at it the other day and at least half the posters don't have misc usernames so have no idea who most of them are anyway.

Cleveland said:

I get the sense that the majority of accounts over there are run by the same like four people

Click to expand...

Basically this.

Cleveland said:

doxxing is gay but who here among us has not been threatened to be doxxed by AKD except Kimm and gwg? He's drunk and it's an empty threat though I do see the value in giving him a timeout over it. Wincel on the other hand legitmately tried to dox people to the point of getting it wrong about someone and reporting a fake linkedin to the DoD. Allegedly

Click to expand...

I think threatening to dox is absolutely a bannable offense. Threatening to find you IRL and beat you up or kill you should also be bannable. I have no ill will towards AKD as he's never said anything off to me but he shouldn't be threatening stuff like that.

Cleveland said:

I got news for you - crying about it is pretty lame too.

Also, saying something is "cringe" is about as lame as it gets online or in real life. Are you a 12 year old girl? or Bodhy?

Click to expand...

I don't see it as Freeburn crying about it at all.

Deezenutz69 said:

I have returned

New misc sucks and is just a bunch of schizo ranting with explosive midget and that quan guy

Click to expand...

Avril lookin thiccc

Lightning Lord Rule said:

I believe they're hanging their hat on a similar defense: it was legal back then so we were trying to get the historical accurate pedophilia.
While having all the historically accurate DEI shit too, of course.

Click to expand...

Was it even legal back then? When the Catholics were running shit I don't think sodomy was legal.

Under the terms of the Constitutio Criminalis Carolina, actions such as murder, manslaughter, robbery, arson, homosexual relations, and witchcraft were henceforth defined as severe crimes. In particular, the Carolina specified that those found guilty of causing harm through witchcraft should be executed with fire, laying the foundation for the mass witch trials between 1580 and 1680. It was also the basis for the use of obtaining confessions by torture.

Click to expand...

Fags were burned at the stake or beheaded.

havoc00 said:

Avril lookin thicccView attachment 573224

Click to expand...

Is she pregnant or just putting on weight?

That's not the original pic...photoshopped if I'm not mistaken.

Hope you're all having a great day/night.

ElboRoom bros u smashing?

Tasty The Treat said:

Yup I've long been at the point where I treat critic praise as a bad thing, especially if they are handing out 9's and 10's to something, they tend to only do that if it pushes "the message." The more I read about this game the more it sounds lame and gay. Helps how I played the original and thought it sucked as well. One of those games that seems to demand you to obsess over it with it's fucked up save system that has some straight up garbage combat mechanics. When I tried to play it I was struggling to see what I could possibly like about it over Elder Scrolls or Baldurs Gate. Heck I would even rather play Dark Souls or Elden Ring and I usually think of those as offputting sweatlord games, but at least their combat isn't broken.

Click to expand...

To think that all it took to raise some of the red flags early on was the Saudi Arabian ratings blocking the game for gay sex and leakers, and of course the director denied that shit.

This one game also opened up a lot of smaller reviewer grifters as well who jumped to defend this game regardless of the bait and switch of the game being contaminated.

And now that you mention it, I do remember how the first game was known for being janky with obtuse mechanics like the weird saving, so I honestly don't understand why so many have a vested interest in defending the game and the studio despite lying to their consumer faces.

Coal Man said:

Just saw this post. Nah, then what they did wasn't just gay but incredibly lame. They defended how much he was a straight guy with his own identity in the first game and then caved like a buncha losers for the second game? Fuck off, I identify as non-buynary.

Click to expand...

It only gets worse the more you read about what they've hidden from people, the complete turn around from being as authentic as possible for a historical fiction game, and the director himself acting like a raging twat waffle.

Past a certain point you just see these patterns like Neo at the end of The Matrix and instinctively know when a game or developer is beyond salvaging.

The set in stone rule has already been established that these people hate you and want your hobbies destroyed, so the only winning move is to play by the same rules as them with zero tolerance while blowing up their failings so everyone else knows to avoid their trash.

The really bad part is how because this game slipped the wool over enough people's eyes, the video game industry will learn that they can do the same thing and get away with it.

*It occurred to me that the whole KCD2 Jew/synagogue bit in a game taking place in what was part of the Holy Roman Empire is an awful lot like the forced synagogue segment in The Last of Us 2, down to lecturing the player and "no violence in the holy site, but it's okay literally everywhere else."

Lightning Lord Rule said:

I believe they're hanging their hat on a similar defense: it was legal back then so we were trying to get the historical accurate pedophilia.
While having all the historically accurate DEI shit too, of course.

Click to expand...

That tracks because another one I saw was this:

Coal Man said:

@Lightning Lord Rule my bad man. I had no experience with this series and was hoping it would be good. Spent an ungodly # of hours playing skyrim, yet BG3 didn't scratch that itch for me... I was looking forward to that complete sandbox experience.

Click to expand...

Don't expect Baldur's Gate "4" to do any better, then...



As a point of consolation, Larian isn't involved at all with this, so the IP owners are going full retard all on their own.

Bald Brah said:

Was it even legal back then? When the Catholics were running shit I don't think sodomy was legal.



Fags were burned at the stake or beheaded.

Click to expand...

As I said above, we're talking about a land smack dab in the middle of the Holy Roman Empire - zero fucking way that it was legal, let alone tolerated.

Therein lies the problem with all of the "playersexual"/player choice cope for these games: if they want to play the whole, "you can choose the bottomed out option," then let me choose the good Catholic who reports the sodomites, Jewish golem witchcraft, and gypsy prostitutes.

Apparently even one of the straight options still has the main character getting literally cucked... well, I guess that explains the glowing critical reviews.

havoc00 said:

ElboRoom bros u smashing?

View attachment 573239

Click to expand...

The geriatric men or the fat chick?

Kendrick fucking sucks

havoc00 said:

Kendrick fucking sucks

Click to expand...

Never heard of him. Changed the channel.

super bowl is gay as fuk srs