Looks like I missed my BTC limit order by about $500 on Thursday's dip. Maybe it hits this week.
It depends on the project, but yeah usually. Uniswap charges fees for trading between a pair of tokens, like say $USDC and $DAI, and those fees are collected and mostly distributed back to people providing liquidity to the pool. The users of Uniswap are mostly not providing liquidity in a pool, but any of them can if they want to, they just find a pool they like and deposit their tokens. If no one does, then you can't swap tokens at all. Aave charges fees for swaps, loans, flash loans, all at various rates, and distributes those back to users who wrap tokens with the Aave wrapper thus providing liquidity for the protocol. Uniswap and Aave also have what's called a governance token, respectively the $UNI and $AAVE tokens, they allow you to propose things to the governance community and vote on those proposals, e.g. Aave's governance page: Aave - Open Source Liquidity Protocol
Sometimes the governance tokens do more stuff, sometimes there are more roles and tokens involved in a protocol, it can get pretty complicated. Uber without Uber Inc I think should be the easiest one to imagine in this regime: the rate the drivers charge and are rewarded for picking you up and driving you is determined by a protocol, the drivers themselves would purchase a driver's license from the protocol, which determines their eligibility for and level of rewards. Uber Inc doesn't need to exist because everyone agrees on the rules, and the orchestration of drivers is already handled by a computer program which can be ported to the blockchain.
And the people who develop said Non-Uber computer program get paid how? They give themselves a bunch of coins up front and work for free until it's validated?
I don't know about that one, it sounds fishy to me.SushiSwap, it's competitor, had no grant but did create a token, and gave a bunch of them to the founder which he then sold on the open market (effectively making him give up control of the project entirely).
I'm sure someone else will be willing to provide more detail but I can give a simple example. You can own an ENS address (*.crypto for example) that points to a webpage that is hosted on IPFS. This would, in theory at least, give you a censorship proof domain name combined with a censorship proof web server.I would love to learn more about this whole “new internet” thing too. I think I am finally understanding the value as a base currency with the natural limitations of thing like BTC and I am getting better at the concept of Smart contracts and the defi systems built on ETH but i still struggle with the “new internet” thing.
How will this change, for example, the way my girl uses internet? She shops on her sites, views friends instagram pics, and then looks up shit to do for us and kids….what would she do differently or how would the backend change?
I am also confused on this “non uber-uber”. What does that mean? Who drives my drunk ass home and how do i find and pay them?
I am also confused on this “non uber-uber”. What does that mean? Who drives my drunk ass home and how do i find and pay them?
Describe somebody accomplishing some sort of task with the "current internet". Describe someone accomplishing the exact same task "new internet". Then highlight the differences and explain why they are important. And do this without using acronyms.
That sounds a whole lot like a pyramid scheme.
And getting in on the ground floor and then trying to further a subscription model
Most NFTs are stupid as shit, its true. The best use cases I can think of are proof of digital ownership. Could use a blockchain for in game items in an MMO for example which could allow developers more control over RMT. They would be able to program in a small cut when you sell that FBSS for taco bell money.Pyramid schemes are based on basic capitalistic behavior. And getting in on the ground floor and then trying to further a subscription model that directly benefits you is a pyramid scheme. Why are people so obsessed with trying to entrench crypto into anything and everything? It makes the entire space a lot less palatable. NFTs are the single most idiotic thing I've ever heard of. And everyone tries to keep moving in for bigger, faster cash grabs. It's all snake oil.
Old internet:
I want to watch the newest Smarter Every Day video, so I load up YouTube, browse to his channel, and watch the video. I like it so much and I want to help fund the next video, so I donate to his Patreon account and if it's a lot he might even mention it in his next video. I pay for a service, and he makes a living, and we get to keep watching videos.
New internet:
I want to watch the newest Smarter Every Day video, so I load up LivePeer, browse to his channel, and watch the video. I like it so much and I want to help fund the next video, so I purchase his community ERC-20 token (which automatically charges a fee that gets sent to his favorite charity and liquidity providers) and lock it up with some ETH liquidity in his community pool. Now I'm making money every time someone else buys his community token, and if the demand for his videos keeps increasing the value of his community token should too.
Further, I can help build the structure of the platform his video is hosted on by becoming a LivePeer orchestrator and/or transcoder and be rewarded for every time someone watches one of his videos. There is no analog for this in the old internet, the closest you can get would be buying Google stock.
EDIT: OH NO!!! Destin from Smarter Every Day just had a diseased hobo shit on his chest for his latest video and everyone hates it! In the old system, I could only hope he sends my money back to me, which he won't. In the new internet, I yank my liquidity back and nope the fuck out, hopefully with some profit.