I like that question though… do they dump the investment in POW set ups or find something else to mine and what would that something be?
There are a ton of things to mine other than ETH. The problem is profitability. You can mine a shitcoin all day long, but if you're getting the same payout in number of coins as you were for ETH you're not going to be profitable. I can look just for my scenario of having one nVidia GPU. I currently clock in around $4-$5 a day profit from mining. It's mining ETH in a pool. If I go look at the list of possible coins to mine after ETH (and for some reason ETH Classic) that drops to at best around $1 a day. There are a few coins in that tier, then it rapidly drops to less than a penny a day profit for coins under that.
Since the writing has somewhat been on the wall for a while I would hope that any large ETH mining operation worth it's salt would have been prepping for this by making sure all their rigs were paid off so they could have a reasonably graceful exit from the space at a minimum loss.
Reverse FUD szn getting ready to start. July is going to be
Yeah, after an abysmal May/June I just finished July up 10% from my June finish, so there's some hope, dare I say. hehhey my red number is almost green, hooray
To CEO of Coinbase. Context being Strike offers 0 fee bitcoin purchases.
He isn't shilling lightning here. He is offering 0 fee bitcoin purchases with Strike. Lightning network is being used for 0 fee transfers on the same service but thats not the topic here. If his service can offer 0 fees and the others can't... the result is fairly obvious isn't it? This is a shot across the bow for other exchanges. Specifically Coinbase and Brian Armstrong as they've repeatedly in the past tried to takedown Bitcoin. Backed BCH during the fork wars, sell shitcoins, etc.
Also, he's talked plenty about lightning as have others. If you don't know about it that's not because he hasn't explained it
Also, he's talked plenty about lightning as have others. If you don't know about it that's not because he hasn't explained it
He’s not talking about HOW doing it for $0 is possible, so my immediate assumption is that it’s a marketing ploy to get adoption before the fee kicks in.
We don’t need to charge users 2%-3% to buy bitcoin. Our innovation as a company comes in our ability to disrupt payments using the Bitcoin and Lightning network. The cost to acquire open-source money on an open network will inevitably be driven to zero, anyways. Why wait? Did you really expect me to undercut Venmo by a few basis points? Did you think I was going to let Coinbase charge the world 2%+ so they can shove shitcoins down everyone’s throat?
No way. We just ripped the pin out of the grenade and tossed it into the crowd. Buying bitcoin will not cost more than it takes to acquire. Buying bitcoin will not subsidize shitcoin casinos. If you want to compete, I’d suggest getting to know the Lightning Network, Strike, and all we’re doing to empower economic freedom for all. Compete on the experience in a truly free market, the way it should be. You won’t survive over-charging users to buy bitcoin any longer.
Speaking of Coinbase, is there any way to tell what your cost basis is?