That's not what I'm saying at all.
What I'm saying is that it incentivizes the government to plant / "fine" crimes to charge large crypto holders with, knowing they get to seize all their coins
Yeah I know- my comment was more of a response to Flobee's (pretty much perpetual) concerns about the government seizing his BTC. No offense Flobee.
But since I know you like to fight, I'll say that I don't really get your point, either. The government could always seize crypto coins as part of civil forfeiture and has previously done so on numerous occasions. I'm not exactly sure how a government stockpile of crypto makes it more or less likely they will seize crypto. They've seized crypto before (and profited from it by selling it), I'm sure they will seize it again, stockpile or no.
At the end of the day, the government is going to seize what valuables the court is going to allow them to seize. In the cases I've dealt with involving civil forfeiture, I've seen them seize all kinds of things- money, crypto, boats, houses, clothes,
shoes, weapons, just about fucking anything. On several occasions, the feds then used the seized assets to open "surplus" stores as part of ATF sting operations (look up Statesboro Blues).
If you want to talk about the argument that civil forfeiture has gotten out of control in the last 20 years or so, and the courts often allow the DoJ waaaaay too much latitude in what (and how much) they seize... well, then I think there's a really good case to make there.
But the crypto thing? Nah, that's not going to change a damn thing about how the DoJ operates regarding forfeiture.