A commenter with the third most popular comment sums it up pretty well.
Comment_sl said:
I assume the subtext of Ms. Gunn's op-ed is that our country is awash in some sort of insidious misogyny that is causing this virulent response to her portrayal of Skyler White. On the other hand, perhaps the writers of these programs are the misogynists, and are writing characters which do a disservice to women. Personally, I disagree with the view that Skyler is "too strong" of a character. If anything, I think viewers are reacting to the fact that Skyler is, in fact, weak--and a hypocrite to boot. She fails miserably to stand up to Walt. While characters like Walter White and Don Draper may be liars and worse, they do seem to live by a code of sorts and they control events, whereas characters like Skyler and Betty Draper are actually weak, seeming to react to events and gain what little power they have through ad hoc maneuvering in reaction to the more powerful male characters. Ultimately, I think it is very human for people to admire the stronger, more consistent characters and to dislike those that are viewed as weak and inconsistent. The question might be, why are female characters consistently written this way?
People hate Skylar because the first 3 seasons to passive aggression to absurd levels. She achieves her strength through subversion fueled by outright humiliation, but ultimately is able to do nothing with it because she is
completelyindecisive about
everythingand lacks the conviction to follow through on
anything. I don't know when writers will "get" it, but being a strong woman does not mean passive aggressively attacking men to render them impotent with a broken will (I guess relative to that one man she seems stronger?). Rather, it means you go out and perform as their equal or better than them, you get shit done and prove yourself. That is a strong female character. A perfect example is Peggy or Ripley.
The fact is,
veryfew men are written the way that Gunn thinks is "strong"--because when writing men, nearly all the qualities that made Skylar up for the first three seasons are almost universally seen as a
terrible. Pete Campbell, for example, is written this way. Manipulative, passive aggressive, exploiting emotional responses ect. And people openly hate him for it, because these are seen as TERRIBLE qualities, in men. But I guess in women of relatively decent moral standing (Compared to Walt), it's seen as strength? Yeah...no.
Anyway, given her other interviews, she seems smart. And it's obvious Gilligan, at least, knows how to write well enough to understand how he was using her. So I have to wonder if she is basing her opinions off the character
now, and not the first three seasons.