I keep laughing at this.Not really. You just tell mom that you don't wanna go to scout camp next summer.
I keep laughing at this.Not really. You just tell mom that you don't wanna go to scout camp next summer.
If she has no memory of what happened, and there were no witnesses, how do you prove there was no consent? Further, what would there be to investigate? I guess if she were drugged with rohypnol or similar, that would be something. But absent that, what would you even do?So what if you wake up with no memory of sex, but have physical evidence of sex? It's possible you were so drunk you couldn't have consented, or potentially drugged. So what you're saying is there would definitely have to be an investigation.
Spoken like someone who's angry/jealous that they aren't partaking. Seriously, how fat are you?No, I'm really just anti-underage drinking and anti-casual sex. There's way too much of it going around on college campuses and no one has the balls to say that it's a recipe for disaster and ultimately the root of the problem. The colleges don't want to be seen as regressive buzzkills by saying maybe all this underage drinking and casual sex is not the best idea. And so they use a much easier scapegoat, aka: all men everywhere.
There could be bruising that indicates a physical struggle if one occurred. There could be circumstantial evidence such as the girl having been on her period (a circumstance under which she never intends to have sex). She could have spoken with friends or even her boyfriend about going out to hang out with the girls and having zero intention of hooking up. Heck, she could have been raped a week before for all we know, sex with a stranger being the last thing she'd be looking for. Maybe she had taken precautions like asking her friends to stick with her all night to make sure nothing happened, only to have the rapist corner her as she came out of the bathroom and coerce her into leaving. Maybe the rapist was somebody who she had already repeatedly rejected and warned to stay away from her. Maybe the rapist has a history of rape accusations. Maybe she was a virgin with strong beliefs that sex should only occur after marriage.If she has no memory of what happened, and there were no witnesses, how do you prove there was no consent? Further, what would there be to investigate? I guess if she were drugged with rohypnol or similar, that would be something. But absent that, what would you even do?
Actually, if you woke up with an ass full of cum, there's a pretty good chance you were just raped. You know, you being a heterosexual male and all.I must have been raped because I have strong religious beliefs and I wouldneversuffer a moment of weakness and ride some dude's cock like it was the last chopper out of 'Nam.
Thats an awful lot of maybes with no proof.There could be bruising that indicates a physical struggle if one occurred. There could be circumstantial evidence such as the girl having been on her period (a circumstance under which she never intends to have sex). She could have spoken with friends or even her boyfriend about going out to hang out with the girls and having zero intention of hooking up. Heck, she could have been raped a week before for all we know, sex with a stranger being the last thing she'd be looking for. Maybe she had taken precautions like asking her friends to stick with her all night to make sure nothing happened, only to have the rapist corner her as she came out of the bathroom and coerce her into leaving. Maybe the rapist was somebody who she had already repeatedly rejected and warned to stay away from her. Maybe the rapist has a history of rape accusations. Maybe she was a virgin with strong beliefs that sex should only occur after marriage.
What kind of lawyer are you again?
No I guess I'd just go find someone to accuse? Guess it doesn't matter who or if I have proof of it, right?Actually, if you woke up with an ass full of cum, there's a pretty good chance you were just raped. You know, you being a heterosexual male and all.
If there were no signs of a physical struggle would you just go "Oh well! Guess I shouldn't drink so much next time! Tee-hee!" Not fucking likely.
Why are you making it a homosexual sex act that we were hypothetically victims of?Seriously, though. Let's say any of you guys go to a party, have a few too many drinks, and wake up with cum in your ass and no memory of what happened. Rape or no rape?
Alright, so after having been anally violated without your consent, you'll just suck it up and forget abut it. Hope it doesn't happen again. And if it does, well... fool me twice, right?No I guess I'd just go find someone to accuse? Guess it doesn't matter who or if I have proof of it, right?
Because I want it to be clear that you didn't give consent. That's important.Why are you making it a homosexual sex act that we were hypothetically victims of?
Really? So going out and getting drunk means you have to take responsibility for being anally raped. Good to know.Men take responsibility for their own actions. Even if sometimes that means waking up with an assfull of crusty cum. Well -- you did SOMETHING to wind up in that situation. You have to isolate the variables.
Given your setup and your options between "Do nothing" and "Run around accusing people" then yes, you do nothing.Alright, so after having been anally violated without your consent, you'll just suck it up and forget abut it. Hope it doesn't happen again. And if it does, well... fool me twice, right?
I was responding to Cad, but those weren't the two options I presented. I said "rape or no rape?"Given your setup and your options between "Do nothing" and "Run around accusing people" then yes, you do nothing.
You can't even craft a hypothetical that works. That should tell you something, Tanoo.
Why not put it on equal footing?Because I want it to be clear that you didn't give consent. That's important.