See, this is is the kind of thinking that makes rape so traumatic for women. A lot of our leftover Puritan culture says that a woman's only value is in the sanctity of her sexual purity. To violate that is to destroy her value as a person.Nah not really. I want to fuck a slut, but marry a virgin or as close to it as possible. Women's value diminishes with every sexual partner she has. Who wants to marry a slut that had 30-50 sexual partners?
This is probably why tanoomba never has a thought about being falsely accused
Man cleared of sexual assault because he is 'too gay to rape'
That DNA mumbo jumbo isn't anywhere nearly as convincing.The woman was given a medical examination which determined that semen was present but that it did not match the DNA of the man accused.
Stop infantilizing women.as long ashegetsherdrunk enough to not remember what happened.
It's hilarious that women actually believe THIS is why men don't want their partner to have had a large number of sexual partners. It couldn't be further from the mark.See, this is is the kind of thinking that makes rape so traumatic for women. A lot of our leftover Puritan culture says that a woman's only value is in the sanctity of her sexual purity. To violate that is to destroy her value as a person.
Spot on.It's hilarious that women actually believe THIS is why men don't want their partner to have had a large number of sexual partners. It couldn't be further from the mark.
It's as simple as the fact that men are territorial. It's fucking primal. If this were 10,000 years ago I would have bashed in the skulls of every man who had ever slept with my new partner, and drank the goo inside, then pee in a ring around the corpse. In modern times, I have to walk through the grocery store with my girl, when she spots an ex and they stop to have an innocent quick chat, or hell, even a smile/wave. Guess what? I STILL WANT TO DESTROY HIM. It's just the way it is. It's far more preferable to be with a woman who has had few sexual partners because this is far less likely to happen on a day-to-day basis.
It's not about Puritan bullshit. It's about caveman bullshit, and the desire to avoid having to suppress murderous jealous rage.
Bro, youre retardedIt's hilarious that women actually believe THIS is why men don't want their partner to have had a large number of sexual partners. It couldn't be further from the mark.
It's as simple as the fact that men are territorial. It's fucking primal. If this were 10,000 years ago I would have bashed in the skulls of every man who had ever slept with my new partner, and drank the goo inside, then pee in a ring around the corpse. In modern times, I have to walk through the grocery store with my girl, when she spots an ex and they stop to have an innocent quick chat, or hell, even a smile/wave. Guess what? I STILL WANT TO DESTROY HIM. It's just the way it is. It's far more preferable to be with a woman who has had few sexual partners because this is far less likely to happen on a day-to-day basis.
It's not about Puritan bullshit. It's about caveman bullshit, and the desire to avoid having to suppress murderous jealous rage.
Really? I figured you'd agree with that particular post. Out of curiosity, what's your opinion on it?Bro, youre retarded
Thats total Rape Ape behavior.Really? I figured you'd agree with that particular post. Out of curiosity, what's your opinion on it?
Sounds like you're a bit beta to me, bro. Not meant as an insult or anythingThats total Rape Ape behavior.
As someone who stopped keeping track of how many women I banged by the time I got to 60ish and nowadays easily in triple digits, it would be super hypocritical for me to hold a girl to some semi virginal standard while maintaining none of my own.
I dont have a problem talking to the exes, they are mostly chill dudes who have their shit together, theyre not some frat gorillas. But then again, I tend to operate in higher echelons of society
Not really. I'm deriving my opinion from your number of sexual partners, your need to share that information when it was unsolicited, your lack of territorial aggression, and your need to share your supposed 'high' social status with us when it was totally irrelevant to the conversation.The problem is you equate alpha to caveman behavior. Im an alpha without having to devolve to 60 iq meathead behavior.
I assure you that you aren't.Bro I am sensing Beta envy.
What you said doesn't contradict what I said in any way. Puritan views on sexuality were just a different expression of those same evolutionary psychological tendencies involved in the same thing you just said.It's hilarious that women actually believe THIS is why men don't want their partner to have had a large number of sexual partners. It couldn't be further from the mark.
It's as simple as the fact that men are territorial. It's fucking primal. If this were 10,000 years ago I would have bashed in the skulls of every man who had ever slept with my new partner, and drank the goo inside, then pee in a ring around the corpse. In modern times, I have to walk through the grocery store with my girl, when she spots an ex and they stop to have an innocent quick chat, or hell, even a smile/wave. Guess what? I STILL WANT TO DESTROY HIM. It's just the way it is. It's far more preferable to be with a woman who has had few sexual partners because this is far less likely to happen on a day-to-day basis.
It's not about Puritan bullshit. It's about caveman bullshit, and the desire to avoid having to suppress murderous jealous rage.
Do you find it hard to control your emotions as an adult? How often do you imsgine destroying people as an adult? Have you ever had a chimpout episode?I assure you that you aren't.
Well then let's call a spade a spade. It has nothing to do with cultural remnants from a less culturally evolved period, and has a lot to do with how we deal with our animalistic motivations conflicting with modern societal pressures.What you said doesn't contradict what I said in any way. Puritan views on sexuality were just a different expression of those same evolutionary psychological tendencies involved in the same thing you just said.