Now, wait a minute here. In your words, you say she (Note: I'm using "she" because this is a reference to real-life scenarios witnessed and described by Quaid) should have been concerned about the "possibility of rape". You didn't say she should be concerned about the "possibility of being taken advantage of, which by the way is totally legal". You're saying a woman has at least partial responsibility forbeing rapedbecause she did, after all, "do the shots".
Don't get me wrong, I think womenshouldbe careful. I think there are things that womenshoulddo to reduce the chances of getting raped, even if that makes me a bad feminist. That doesn't make a rape any less of a rape, nor does it make a rapist any less of a rapist.
If you leave your bicycle out in public without locking it, there's a more than decent chance somebody will steal it. People will tell you "What were you thinking, leaving your bike unchained? Of course somebody stole it!" But see, the person who stole your bike is still a thief. That person absolutely broke the law, and if it's in any way possible to find and prove who did it, that person should absolutely be punished for it. Making a rapist's job easier doesn't mean it doesn't count as rape when it happens.