Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
a_skeleton_03_sl said:
No way we could have survived long enough to evolve to that point. Cat people or reptilians should have evolved way before primates, just on suitability to survive.
Click to expand...
Dude, you dropped this bombshell disavowing evolution and supporting creationism and then you left. Stop dropping into an argument and then jetting out when you start taking flack.
 
Sebudai

Sebudai

Ssraeszha Raider
12,022
22,504
I assumed there was a 50%+ chance he was joking since the only way his posts could've conveyed a more stereotypical misunderstanding of evolution is if he included the classic "if we came from monkeys, why we still got monkeys runnin' around huh?!" line.
 
Jive Turkey

Jive Turkey

Karen
6,722
9,087
This is one of my favourite evolution videos. It completely crushes a god of the gaps argument in ruthless fashion. How someone can watch this and deny evolution is beyond me

 
Lithose

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
a_skeleton_03_sl said:
Now take the inverse. How did just us and only us evolve so much higher than any other species and the only planet to do so?How did we with how stupidly our bodies are designed to survive if we had to do it by tooth and nail.You take your standard human body and put it into ancient times and try to come up with a computer model of us surviving, it would never happen. The animals out there are beyond our capabilities but our brains keep them at bay .... now. No way we could have survived long enough to evolve to that point. Cat people or reptilians should have evolved way before primates, just on suitability to survive.
Click to expand...
I love it when people say this; like humans are just physical cripples. The human body is probably the most efficient warm blooded body on the planet. Between sweating, bipedal locomotion and a few other advances, there really isn't a piece of prey that can outlast us. Also, because of our brains, we can reason out tactical decisions that avoid confrontation in most given moments, so we can choose to fight when we have a huge advantage--and that's how our ancestors dominated even with simple sticks and stone tools. Efficiency. I know it's not as flashy as raw strength, or speed of amazing smell/eyesight. But humans are ridiculously good at it; even mammoths were brought down with simple sharpened sticks by early humans who threw the stick at them, then ran away as the mammoth charged, and continued this process for hours and hours until the mammoth fell over and the humans killed it.

That combination of reasoning, social behavior and efficiency was far more powerful than any claw and set of jaws was. And, it was especially good during our break away (According to one theory)--because at the time Africa was changing dramatically year by year; due to some odd weather phenomenon. It gave a huge advantage to animals that could migrate with minimal energy use (Which walking is excellent at doing) AND an additional huge advantage to animals that could make synthetic (Tools) adaptations faster than physical adaptations; because physical adaptations were a hindrance due to the quick climate change (By the time natural selection favored more blubber, so fat asses were able to breed more, it was hot again and more fat was bad--This is a very crude approximation of the theory, but just giving an example.) But essentially it was a perfect storm of tool use, and effeciency that let us rise. The higher need for tool use favored those among early humans who could reason/think better--while the higher need for efficiency allowed those whose bodies were more efficient to hunt better; and this allowed those humans to have excess calories for their higher-tool using brains.

Anyway, that's the theory--you can believe or disbelieve the second part. But the part about efficiency and the human body is absolutely true. That is our physical "super power"--If you were raised in a jungle, with a standard tribe of family (That is a feature of primates), even with only simple tools like sharpened sticks and rocks? You'd easily outperform ANY predator on the planet (Statistically). The human body is amazing, just not amazing in the ways most people think of as amazing (We tend to revere strength, speed ect--so it's no wonder that this gets overlooked. But in extreme distances, humans can even outrun horses. There is literally a race that does this every year)


(btw, Cat people didn't have upper bodies prone to tool use due to their time in the trees. And Reptiles have a huge weakness; being cold blooded makes them extremely susceptible to temperature change--want to guess how many ice ages the Earth has gone through? That's kind of a big defect to have if your species can be wiped out due to natural variations in the earth, much less things like asteroids ect.)
 
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,763
When it's about evolution our bodies are the most efficient in the universe honed over billions of years.

When it's about creation our bodies are the worst designed system ever and we shouldn't be able to walk because our bodies are so poorly designed.
 
Lithose

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
a_skeleton_03_sl said:
When it's about evolution our bodies are the most efficient in the universe honed over billions of years.

When it's about creation our bodies are the worst designed system ever and we shouldn't be able to walk because our bodies are so poorly designed.
Click to expand...
rrr_img_73660.jpg


Most effecient=/=perfect. Plenty of flaws in humans that makeaspectsof their design just bad. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean they aren't better designed than all their competitors, within this particular competition (Note: The competition dictates the supremacy of design, not some arbitrary metric). Your statement is like saying that because the pinto can win a race against Christopher Reeves without his wheel chair--that the Pinto is a perfect design with no problems.No.It simply means you're faster in a Pinto. Just because early humans had the tools to outperform other species, doesn't mean there aren't serious flaws (Flaws that we, as a more advanced species, can easily see.)
 
Cad

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,426
49,042
a_skeleton_03_sl said:
When it's about evolution our bodies are the most efficient in the universe honed over billions of years.

When it's about creation our bodies are the worst designed system ever and we shouldn't be able to walk because our bodies are so poorly designed.
Click to expand...
I know you're just trying to miss the point to be a faggot, but Lithose's point was essentially:

Our bodies are amazing - at the things we evolved to do, which aren't really relevant once you enter a civilization. If we were designed by a god to be part of a civilization, we wouldn't be designed this way. We're evolved specifically for efficiency, which is a pointless adaptation once you have agriculture and civilization. For the things we do as part of a civilization, our bodies are shitty. We aren't very strong, aren't very fast, we have all sorts of health issues that impact us, etc. But if you put us out in the jungle against the other predators (you know, where we EVOLVED) we are fucking awesome at that, compared to the other predators.

Get it, retard?
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,019
79,756
If you want to get railed by thick black cock have at it but you have a responsibility to your partner to not do it behind their back while lying to them. Maybe he'd like to watch.
 
Arbitrary

Arbitrary

Tranny Chaser
29,019
79,756
Himeo_sl said:
They aren't terrible people. They're just idiots that were never told the party ends.

This is her when she hits 40.
Click to expand...
Today I am 39, with too many ex-boyfriends to count and, I am told, two grim-seeming options to face down: either stay single or settle for a "good enough" mate.
Click to expand...
Boy, I sure would like to be the "good enough" mate a woman in her 40s is settling for.

Men have been rapidly declining -- in income, in educational attainment and in future employment prospects -- relative to women.

And while the rise of women has been good for everyone, the decline of males has obviously been bad news for men -- and bad news for marriage.

For all the changes the institution has undergone, modern women as a whole have never been confronted with such a radically shrinking pool of what are traditionally considered to be "marriageable" men -- those who are better educated and earn more than they do.

So women are now contending with what we might call the new scarcity.

Even as women have seen their range of options broaden in recent years -- for instance, expanding the kind of men it's culturally acceptable to be with, and making it okay not to marry at all -- the new scarcity disrupts what economists call the "marriage market" in a way that in fact narrows the available choices, making a good man harder to find than ever.

At the rate things are going, the next generation's pool of good men will be significantly smaller.
Click to expand...
I can't marry him, I make more money than he does.
 
Himeo

Himeo

Vyemm Raider
3,263
2,802
Michael's Story

Michael says:
November 25, 2012 at 2:54 am
Hello. Is there an introduction board for this website? My name is Michael. I've been reading this website for 3 days. I'm shocked to see everything I've experiencing written in such a perfectly stated way. Never before have I seen a blog/media outlet so perfectly written. The writer is surely a genius. I'm amazed and relived to see so many responses. It means I'm not alone.

I'm 32 years old and have never been married. Unfortunately (or fortunately I'm not sure which anymore at this point) I have no kids. I am single and alone and not dating anyone. I live in Los Angeles. My income was $120,000.00 (net earnings after creative deductions and business taxes) in 2011. Income is projected to be $170,000.00 (net earnings after business taxes) in 2012. I'm exactly the kinds of "independent man" women claim they want. I drive a luxury car with an amazing apartment in Los Angeles directly on the beach. It's quite a panty moistener and costs me $6,000.00 per month. I work from home because an office would cost at least another $2,000.00 month. I keep in great shape. Gym 3-4 a week + running + organic diet (I spend $700-$900.00 a month on organic foods and supplements) I was raised in a Christian "7th Heaven" (old TV show) type household. We always went to church. Strong hard working father figure was always present for me and my siblings. I went to private school, university, law school, and then started my own practice at 28 years old.

My parents met and married in college. They have been married for 39 years. And it hurts me to the core to be 32 and unmarried. Alone. Without a loving wife. I feel pain from it every single day. It's like a sharp invisible dagger constantly stabbing at me. But perhaps I'm part of the problem listed in the graphs above. Let me explain why:

I went to the same college my parents met and married at. I was hoping to meet marry and settle down. Instead I was met with hundreds young college aged women who were NOT interested in marriage. They were interested in: 1) Partying 2) Having sex. College was 24/7 fuck fest. At first I was able to begrudgingly "socialize" in this element. What do I mean by "this element" within this context? College: Extreme social promiscuity, cheating, drama, drugs, and parties. I was an observer but NEVER a direct participant because my heart would not let me. This eventually caused me to stick out as a third wheel observer on campus. Someone who was always "not mixing" or "participating". As a result I never enjoyed the benefits. I rarely dated. Instead I was sneered at. Cute girls flicked their fingers at me. I was used by women as a person to tell their problems to. I was passed over. I was seen as "weak "lame" and "boring". I was ignored in the hallways, library, classes, by these women. And it didn't help I was cash strapped broke working a minimum wage job and eating Raman noodles..

The vast majority of these young hot girls vigorously pursued college life sex like you would not believe. They had sex with a large variety of guys. What I personally call "lily padding". These girls did anything and anyone in the name of "fun" (fun=parties, fun= sex with new people, fun= drugs, fun= raves, fun = frat party etc.

It hurt me to watch these girls go out of their way to pursue and spread their legs for complete losers. COMPLETE LOSERS. I'm talking: Hi I work in a carnival part time, I'm covered in tattoos, I have no job, I failed my minimum wage drug test and I'm in a band. These guys were losers. Some did not even go to the college! They would hop a bus stay with friends and get laid THAT NIGHT.

Many nights I could not sleep because of the girls getting fucked hard. 1,2,3,4 dorms down. The dorms were old military barracks from the 1940's with vents through the ceilings. It was very loud. All the time. I remember how much it hurt to be rejected by one girl in particular I had my open hopeless romantic heart set on. We had allot in common. I pursued her like a complete gentlemen - and was eventually turned down. That same weekend after getting turned down I got to hear her getting fucked hard and loud in the room next door. The guy who lived there was a super scraggly unattractive heavy drug user covered in tattoos majoring in "music studies". This girl was young hot thin beautiful in her physical prime. I never said anything. But I felt so hurt she turned me down for casual sex with a guy like that.
This guy was very open about his exploits with her and told me not to worry because practically every guy he knew fucked her. As the years passed the same thing happened again and again, and again and again, in various ways with all kinds of unrelated girls. What I mean is: I was looking for a LTR leading to marriage. I would meet trade numbers talk and "feel" a girl was a good person. Then she would do other guys. Or I would find out things like this. When this kind of thing happens to me over and over all through my life..it hurts me and makes me doubt senses. What is wrong with me that my heart is telling me she is a good person when she is clearly not?

As time went on I was labeled "husband material" by the girls on my campus. This phrase continued to plague me into my late 20's. This label resulted in ZERO DATES all through college. I wasn't "down with it". I wasn't "participating" etc (sex, drugs, parties, etc.) My heart wasn't into it. So I wasn't entitled to any of the benefits (having sex with young attractive girls in their prime etc.). However party guys, flash in a pan athletes, loser guys in bands, wanna be DJ's and self-professed "club promoters" - were ALWAYS getting these girls at their youngest hottest physical prime. Basically the more of a loser the guy was. the more these women would have sex with them. Hot sorority girls flocked to Football players like a butterfly's on a beast. It didn't even matter if the guy was black. College athletes did not even TRY to get laid.

One night I had enough. I confronted a room of 8-10 gorgeous white girls. These girls were 18-24 years old. I asked them if they planned to get married. All seemed to say more or less - YES. I asked what their future husband would think about their behavior. I was immediately met with hostility. I was told the future husband would "never know" and "it's none of his business". The girls said they knew exactly what they were doing and were planning to "have their fun" (fun= partying, fun=sex, fun=going on spring break etc.) and would "settle down later". I asked: when are you planning to settle down? They said: "It depends" and "probably around 27, 28" or "maybe sooner it depends". I really put the girls on the spot. During our exchange they saw I was upset. They told me I should be happy because "nice guys finish first in the end". I told them you cannot have your cake and eat it to. Then I was told by Kaylene (a young thin super sexy blonde with curves in all the right places (who BTW refused to date me even though we were friends and according to her roommate had sex with almost 30 guys in one semester ) she told me "Michael let me tell you something: not only am I going to have my cake eat it and eat it too. I'm going to have it with ice cream and sprinkles". All of the girls laughed and smiled in agreement.

I thought things would change after college. They didn't.

Now at 32 and successful these women are hitting me. In my mind these are the same women who rejected me. I'm not interested. The Bible says something to the effect of "don't forsake the wife of your youth" or something like "remember your young wife"? Something like that. How am I supposed to remember something I never had? I have no history with these women. Ticking ovaries are scandalous. They will lie and say anything to get what they want. Which is: BABIES AND A LOVING HUSBAND TO PAY THEIR BILLS. Yet these women did not even give a few good years of their youth!

As a man I am very visual. God made me this way. I cannot help finding a physically beautiful woman attractive. Why did these women not at least give me a few years of their youth so I would have time to fall in love with them and permanently burn their image in my mind's eye? I need something to remember when we are 50 and married. Yet she spent her 20's parceling herself out to guys who gave her nothing and offers nothing to the guy who gives her everything. I'm expected to commit hard earned resources to raising children with what is ultimately a suspect woman whose history I know nothing about. A 30+ unmarried women has very high chance of having a questionable past and baggage. I believe the more men a woman has been with the less likely she is to be emotionally committed each subsequent one. When you have handed out little pieces of your heart over years to dozens of different men what is left for the husband you proclaim to truly love? What value do the words "I love you" mean when she has stared into the eyes of 10-100+ different men and said the same thing?

At 30+ women's physical appearance has nowhere to go but DOWN. Is this what women mean by "saving the best for last"? Marrying at 30+? How can women spend trillions of dollars a year on beauty products yet at the same time claim a women's age "shouldn't be important" to a man? And what about children? Did they ever think their husbands might want to have children? What's more likely to naturally produce a quicker pregnancy and healthy offspring? A fertile 24 year old in her physical prime. or a 35 year old aging womb? What if I want multiple children? At 30+ a women can easily before infertile after her first pregnancy.
As a result of everything I've seen and experienced in my life I would like to make an announcement to all the desperate 30+ year old women out there: I would rather suffocate and die then spend my hard earned income, love, trust, and substance on you. Your entitled, ageing, feminist, jaded, baggage laden and brainwashed. And if I cannot marry a women in her 20's I REFUSE TO EVER GET MARRIED. Given my high income this should not be a problem. However I'm concerned at some point I will have to start looking overseas (Ukraine, Russia, Eastern Europe etc.). I'm not going to marry one of these 30+ ageing entitled females who clearly have an agenda of their own. I intend to get married once. Marriage is meant to be forever. I will not be a starter husband for one of these used up women. I can't tell you the number of men I've known who married late and were rewarded by losing everything they spent their lives building.

The way I see it I've been given the following choices:

1) Marry a 30+ women.
2) Marry a women in her twenties
3) Be single and enjoy my money.
Click to expand...
Alpha fucks beta bucks.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.