- 27,713
- 32,825
Check out her article where she blames Anthony for his pics getting out.
Theres brand of creepy infidelity | Digital Trends
It's okay if it's a dude's dick, amirite.
Check out her article where she blames Anthony for his pics getting out.
Lol women.Check out her article where she blames Anthony for his pics getting out.
Theres brand of creepy infidelity | Digital Trends
It's okay if it's a dude's dick, amirite.
This is the dumbest thing you've ever writtenLet me see if I get this: If a guy buys a Porsche, does he take part of the responsibility if that Porsche gets stolen? If he hadn't bought the Porsche, after all, there would have been nothing for the thief to steal. He knows damn well Porsches are sought after and nobody forced him to buy one.
...Right?
Oh, I've seen this before. Does Jlaw no longer have the photos?Let me see if I get this: If a guy buys a Porsche, does he take part of the responsibility if that Porsche gets stolen? If he hadn't bought the Porsche, after all, there would have been nothing for the thief to steal. He knows damn well Porsches are sought after and nobody forced him to buy one.
...Right?
don't leave your $800 bike unlocked and unattended for 5 minute in front of Wal Mart or else it will get stolen.This is more like leaving the Porsche running with the keys in it on a big city street while you go see a movie.
DON'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO OPPRESSOR....I mean, that's probably a bad idea, yeah.don't leave your $800 bike unlocked and unattended for 5 minute in front of Wal Mart or else it will get stolen.
By a black kid.don't leave your $800 bike unlocked and unattended for 5 minute in front of Wal Mart or else it will get stolen.
If the accounts were hacked, it seems more like someone coming along and cutting your lock and then blaming you for having the bike in the first place.don't leave your $800 bike unlocked and unattended for 5 minute in front of Wal Mart or else it will get stolen.
the bike would be incredibly furnished, with gold and silver outlines and ancient relic stone to cover it's glorious frame. out of 10,000 locked bikes, it will stand out.If the accounts were hacked, it seems more like someone coming along and cutting your lock and then blaming you for having the bike in the first place.
no one wants their bike stolen.I love the pics too, but it wasn't a voluntary release.
it's not legal and he will go to prison.Just because she is an actress doesn't mean that it should be legal to hack into her photo album and post it everywhere.
no one would do it because there is no reward in it.Hell, even doing it to a porn star would still be illegal and rightly so.
No, it really isn't. Cars are cars and photos on a cloud are photos on a cloud. Being a celebrity might make you a more likely target, but the technicalities of hacking are the same whether the target is celebrity photos or puppy photos.This is more like leaving the Porsche running with the keys in it on a big city street while you go see a movie.
White guys always seem to have the best solutions to problems that don't affect them. Ever notice that?I think in general women could benefit greatly from learning how to not give a fuck about this sort of thing. "Oh my god people saw me naked and now I have to feel bad and embarrassed about it because... reasons!"
Internalized misogyny, bros.
So... a Porsche?the bike would be incredibly furnished, with gold and silver outlines and ancient relic stone to cover it's glorious frame. out of 10,000 locked bikes, it will stand out.
No, it really isn't. Cars are cars and photos on a cloud are photos on a cloud. Being a celebrity might make you a more likely target, but the technicalities of hacking are the same whether the target is celebrity photos or puppy photos.
White guys always seem to have the best solutions to problems that don't affect them. Ever notice that?
So... a Porsche?
Listen, if you guys need to rationalize violating a human being's rights to get fap material, go ahead. I don't know if you realize this, though, but the internet is chock full of ladies who are more than happy to show you what they look like naked. You could fap to a different one every night for the rest of your life. So I'm totally OK with a celebrity possessing photographs they don't want me to see. We don't have to see EVERYONE naked. Keep making excuses and telling me how a celebrity is foolish for not assuming her rights would be violated, though. Frankly, I think that Fap Guilt bullshit is pretty weak.
Not to mention there is no implicit right to privacy.There are no rights to privacy being infringed upon here.Right to control distribution, yes. When the individuals took the compromising photographs they basically gave away their privacy. Now it is a matter of copyright, unless viewing is innately illegal (ie CP).Tanoomba,
You're just recycling the idiotic RIAA music/movie argument in regards to piracy.
Stealing a car isn't the same as "stealing" a digital file. He didn't take the original, he simply copied it.