Why not? What do you think "taking control of your sexuality" means?Does taking nudes of yourself = taking control of your sexuality?
I haven't the slightest idea, I don't brood on this jazz all day. I wonder if we'll see a drop in women taking control of their sexuality now that the Fappening has come.Why not? What do you think "taking control of your sexuality" means?
I will do three of these four things!Embrace your meme! Sadly eat sandwiches on the park bench! Print your retarded cat's face on tshirts! Drink your own piss!
There are two different things here at play, what that average person thinks of privacy, and what that law considers privacy. With the exception of email, everything you upload to a server outside of your control, it is not consider private since you are sharing it with the company that owns the service. Even the recent case about cell phone data and pics, dealt exclusively with pics stored on the device, not on the internet. If someone knows more about it please correct the privacy part.Do you have a daughter? Suppose someone copied her private diary and gave it out to her entire school. Would you argue that was a matter of copyright and distribution, not a violation of her privacy?
Come on. We can enjoy JLaw's tits and still not lose all sense of objectivity.
Apple shares a big part of the blame. They marketed their service as secure, when the actual flaw is very negligent. To put it in layman term, they made a lock, that if you try the Wong key too many times, by process of elimination you'll guess the right key, and then they allowed the lock to service thousands of requests per second.Ha ha ha what? the Victorian ideals of female sexual are under attack, you say?
Nobody is seriously criticizing these actresses for how they choose to exercise their libidos, dude (nobody who matters, anyway). The problem is that people's private information is being stolen by hackers. Did you not get the memo? These womenhave been"taking control of their sexuality". Unfortunately that "control" has been wrestled away from them by some scummy pieces of shit who bear the entirety of the blame in this scenario.
Hypothetical: Let's say the FBI decides to level possession of child pornography charges against anyone who even downloaded an image dump that included pics of the underage gymnast. Would the same people now claiming the actresses should have known better say the same thing about the men about to get a criminal record and become registered sex offenders? After all, if you knowingly download hundreds of pictures that were illegally stolen and never approved for distribution, you have to know there's a chance there might be some sketchy photos in there, right?
Privacy law can be really murky because so much of it has to do with expectations of privacy, which can vary. There aren't a lot of bright lines in that sector of the law.There are two different things here at play, what that average person thinks of privacy, and what that law considers privacy. With the exception of email, everything you upload to a server outside of your control, it is not consider private since you are sharing it with the company that owns the service. Even the recent case about cell phone data and pics, dealt exclusively with pics stored on the device, not on the internet. If someone knows more about it please correct the privacy part.
Actual crypto is rarely broken for the purpose of these "hacks" usually it is software error or human error, no amount of crypto would change that.I think the sooner that everyone realizes the internet is in fact a public space, regardless of what we would prefer the reality to be or what the sales pitch is, the better off we'll all be.
And it will be a public space until we develop that magical quantum cryptography we keep hearing about. I suspect by the time we do develop it the point will be moot, as it will be accompanied by a different innovation in computing altogether.
I noticed your quotes. You think this was intentional?If you don't record compromising images of yourself, it's far more difficult to have them 'accidentally' distributed.
Every brand of device/OS has suffered security mishaps. None is immune and knee-jerk switching wouldn't put you on a secure device.I'm amazed at the amount of koolaid that people drank with Apple, and how they seems immune to PR backlash. The celebrities and people who got hacked should stage a protest and switch to another service. Fuck i would if my pics were stolen like that. This wasn't a sophisticated hack, it was the simplest hack there is.
2 issues with this:I think the sooner that everyone realizes the internet is in fact a public space, regardless of what we would prefer the reality to be or what the sales pitch is, the better off we'll all be.
who assumes all financial transactions on the internet are safe at all? you've seriously never heard of identity theft or the rate people's cards get stolen on the internet all the time? the internet isn't really all the safe at all, people's money get's stolen everyday on the internet.2 issues with this:
1) If we all assume that privacy simply can not exist when using the internet, then that's the end of eBay, Amazon, PayPal, Steam, online banking, bitcoin, etc. I don't see people being labelled as stupid for doing their shopping online or paying their bills online or having a PayPal account. Are we to assume that financial transactions are safe but photo storage is not? Why?