Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,214
Another good argument for why tracking doesn't really fit in the American workplace is that most of one's working life, as a 'pretty smart but not rocket surgery smart person' involves dealing with people who are dumber than you on nearly continual basis. Detracking, or at least radically shifting our tracking system, would actually better prepare kids for the reality of the American workplace
So you think that making the smartest kids deal with dumbshits all day will be more beneficial than an actual rigorous education? Interesting theory....
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
Not uncommon, actually. Often, the real biggest enemy of women are their own mothers, either by manipulation through guilt or pushing their failings / psychosis on to their daughters. For every young woman riding the cock carrousel, there is probably a resentful mother who wishes it was her and makes their daughter feel guilty about it. For every successful single woman there is usually a mom who never got to pursue their life ambitions and is jealous of their daughter's independence. But despite all of this (or any other bad blood you ever see between a mother and daughter), it always seems like daughters are tied to their moms by a string and never stray far away from them. It is this weird co-dependent miserable self feeding cycle that I see a lot of women in, usually starting when the mom wants to live vicariously through their daughter's formative early life experiences to make up for perceived failings in their own (think Prom, Wedding, High School). Anyone who has grown up around Catholic girls knows exactly what I am talking about.
This is pretty much the opposite of what happened to me. My parents told me they weren't saving a dime for me to go to college, and if I wanted to go I'd better get scholarships, so I did. I went to the cheapest school possible and lived at home, because my parents made it clear that if I moved out I wouldn't be welcomed back, so I didn't take risks and take out loans and go to better schools, which I probably should have. I was too scared to live independently because I had never actually been treated like a human being and I wasn't sure how to be a person. To this day, I'm 33 years old and still don't really know how to be a person, don't really think of myself as a person, have zero self esteem, and I realize the world is filled with horrible people who can smell that out and use that to hurt me or take advantage of me.

Looking back, I knew C++, VB, Java, Javascript and HTML before I ever left high school (a decent feat in 1999) and I should have left home and headed somewhere with better job opportunities the day I graduated and never even went to college. But it's hard to take risks when you have absolutely no self-esteem, and my parents knew that and that's why they treated me that way.

There's really no 'getting my life back' when I never had one in the first place. I'm literally the saddest, most pathetically meek person you could ever imagine meeting.

As for the settlement money, that'll all be eaten up by the divorce that must happen immediately after the stuff with the house is resolved. I'm here working on the case and working on the house so that it can be sold in the divorce and my mom can cut all financial ties with my stepfather.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
In other first world counties it has been changed, but they do not have the level of inequality we do. So given the current economic makeup of America, no, it can't. What we CAN do is raise standards across the board and raise both the minimum and median tracks up to something more acceptable for a first world country.

Seriously, let's all go watchWaiting for 'Superman' (2010) - IMDband come back. It's a pretty good movie.
I've seen it. I didn't come away from it with any amazing knowledge I didn't have before, except that teachers unions and tenure can be difficult to work with. But that doesn't seem surprising at all, who the fuck came up with the idea to give anybody tenure at any job?
 

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
14,667
31,531
Yeah that waiting with Superman shit is mostly right wing propaganda for tearing down and/or privatizing education, anyhow.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
Exactly, you would have to raise the standards up to around what we currently expect of the 75th+ percentile in order to prevent the scenario in your second line. You still have the oldest measure in the book, grades, to incentivize and differentiate the 90th percentile kids from the 50th percentile kids.
But what happens if you do this is the overwhelmingly mexican and black schools in many districts (Dallas ISD for example) already don't meet the shitty standards, so you raise the standards, then what? Kids will just drop out or be held back until they are 18 and kicked out. I don't think that would actually change anything.

Because we have a do-nothing congress, states that want to fund everything BUT education, teachers unions filled with lazy educators, and a large percentage of the population that believes any attempt at federal education reform is some kind of government mind control agenda. Education in this country is fucked from both sides.
Well, I probably agree with that "mostly", although I don't think congress has much to do with education, the US actually spends more per student than Germany by a fair amount. I have no idea what the teachers union situation in Germany looks like.

Yes I have facebook, so I get the education reform mind control thing. The country is full of idiots. But on the flip side, I don't think common core math is going to change anything; the problem is cultural more than anything. There's a large portion of the country that simply does not give a fuck about education, or if they do, its religious indoctrination they want and not a modern education.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
And Mist, complete this sentence:

Tracking isn't ideal, what we REALLY need to do is:
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
So you think that making the smartest kids deal with dumbshits all day will be more beneficial than an actual rigorous education? Interesting theory....
No, the absolute smartest kids would be shuttled to districts large enough to actually make full gifted programs.

ALL of the other college bound kids, from the average to the fairly smart, would be given a much more rigorous education than our average kids are given now. I think this is preferable to the situation we have now where some lucky college bound kids are put in with the A tough while others are relegated to getting a fairly lousy education in with the B tough which represents a mix of college bound and non-college bound kids.

Then your vocational track would be 'dumbshits' either. In there would also be 'pretty smart' kids who demonstrate very strong vocational/mechanical ability. These kids would become your production engineers and civil engineers and other crunchy engineer types and they'd get experience in school from working with other mechanically minded people who are just not as smart as they are.

The remedial students aka 'dumbshits' in your terminology would still be in remedial programs designed to bring them up to the standard, rather than what we have now where there's just a ghetto substandard educational track for anyone that gets put into the C trough.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
No, the absolute smartest kids would be shuttled to districts large enough to actually make full gifted programs.

ALL of the other college bound kids, from the average to the fairly smart, would be given a much more rigorous education than our average kids are given now. I think this is preferable to the situation we have now where some lucky college bound kids are put in with the A tough while others are relegated to getting a fairly lousy education in with the B tough which represents a mix of college bound and non-college bound kids.

Then your vocational track would be 'dumbshits' either. In there would also be 'pretty smart' kids who demonstrate very strong vocational/mechanical ability. These kids would become your production engineers and civil engineers and other crunchy engineer types and they'd get experience in school from working with other mechanically minded people who are just not as smart as they are.

The remedial students aka 'dumbshits' in your terminology would still be in remedial programs designed to bring them up to the standard, rather than what we have now where there's just a ghetto substandard educational track for anyone that gets put into the C trough.
There's no shuttling of people to other districts, and at least in Texas (don't know about other states but probably similar) the school districts are actually an independent governing agency, they transcend city borders and are entities to themselves. The process to merge or split or modify them in any way simply isn't going to happen on any large scale, it requires referendums.

Most of the districts in big cities are big enough to build a school for the top 2% anyway, if such a thing was what they wanted.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
There's no shuttling of people to other districts, and at least in Texas (don't know about other states but probably similar) the school districts are actually an independent governing agency, they transcend city borders and are entities to themselves. The process to merge or split or modify them in any way simply isn't going to happen on any large scale, it requires referendums.

Most of the districts in big cities are big enough to build a school for the top 2% anyway, if such a thing was what they wanted.
Right, there isn't. See my point about every district being its own little fiefdom when it comes to education. That absolutely must change if we want anything that produces the results of the German system.

The reason tracking works in Germany is because a) they have less inequality than we do and b) their tracking systems are not lazily designed like our own. We keep our tracking systems shitty to enforce some kind of racist/classist agenda, and because educators are lazy.

Also remember that fully half of the population of this country does not live in a city, a problem that does not really exist in Europe or Japan. Exceptional students of all classes and colors are being underserved in rural schools that don't have the resources to make full fledged gifted programs.

Since we can't have a federal takeover of education, we need states to abolish their independent school districts and establish systems that create higher minimum and median standards state-wide.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
But what happens if you do this is the overwhelmingly mexican and black schools in many districts (Dallas ISD for example) already don't meet the shitty standards, so you raise the standards, then what? Kids will just drop out or be held back until they are 18 and kicked out. I don't think that would actually change anything.
We don't know they will fail. There's nothing innately wrong with these kids. When they are placed in charter schools, they usually succeed. It's the schools.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
When they are placed in charter schools, they usually succeed.
Citation needed

But in any case, a charter school would be a self-selected population of those that chose to apply to the school; they by definition already give a shit about education and took the time and effort to apply to the charter school.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
Yeah that waiting with Superman shit is mostly right wing propaganda for tearing down and/or privatizing education, anyhow.
It doesn't have to be though. There's absolutely no reason why states couldn't make schools with the same standards as these charter schools. And conservatives aren't always 100% wrong on everything (just usually.)

Most charter schools are not tracked btw.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
Literally hundreds of case studies, and over a dozen documentaries on the topic.
Can you cite a few?

Some fact-checking is in order, and the place to start is with the film's quiet acknowledgment that only one in five charter schools is able to get the "amazing results" that it celebrates. Nothing more is said about this astonishing statistic. It is drawn from a national study of charter schools by Stanford economist Margaret Raymond (the wife of Hanushek). Known as the CREDO study, it evaluated student progress on math tests in half the nation's five thousand charter schools and concluded that 17 percent were superior to a matched traditional public school; 37 percent were worse than the public school; and the remaining 46 percent had academic gains no different from that of a similar public school. The proportion of charters that get amazing results is far smaller than 17 percent.Why did Davis Guggenheim pay no attention to the charter schools that are run by incompetent leaders or corporations mainly concerned to make money? Why propound to an unknowing public the myth that charter schools are the answer to our educational woes, when the filmmaker knows that there are twice as many failing charters as there are successful ones? Why not give an honest accounting?
Overall Performance The average charter school student now gains an additional 8 days of learning
each year in reading, compared to the loss of 7 days each year reported in 2009. In math, charter
students in 2009 posted 22 fewer days of learning; now that gap is closed so their learning each year is
on par with their peers in traditional public schools. These results reflect an average of the latest three
growth periods (Spring 2008 - Spring 2011). When the average growth is examined for different periods
over time, the performance trend in both reading and math improves. In the most recent period (the
growth period from Spring 2010 to Spring 2011), learning gains in reading are more positive than in any
earlier period, though all five views are positive and significantly better than TPS. Average charter
learning gains in math do not differ significantly from VCR performance in any of the periods studied.
This means that for math learning in charter schools is no different on average than learning in TPS.
https://credo.stanford.edu/documents...%20Summary.pdf

??
 

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
You need to get crunked, mist. Like seriously mindbendingly crunked.

Go out to a field with a fifth of bourbon and a bag of weed in the afternoon and don't come back home until dawn. Granted, that might work better around here. Re-interpret to suit the tactical situation.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
Those are statistical overviews of charter school performance.

I'm talking about case studies of students. When students are taken out of poorly performing schools and placed in merely average charter schools, they almost always perform better. Your point was that there was something wrong with the students in those schools rather than the schools themselves. Your 'data' has absolutely nothing to do with the point you were trying to make.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
Mist, you owe your mother nothing. Get out or stop whining about it. Being a miserable jerk to everyone because of something you could easily change isn't fair to anyone, least of all yourself.

I mean, jesus, talking about killing yourself? You need help, like go to your school and tell them. If you were one of my students and told me that story, I would report it as a serious medical issue.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
25,444
49,117
When students are taken out of poorly performing schools and placed in merely average charter schools, they almost always perform better.
Ok, you got data to back it up? I'm fine with it and I think it makes sense given that charter school populations are self selected. But I'd like to see the data.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,206
23,406
Mist, you owe your mother nothing. Get out or stop whining about it. Being a miserable jerk to everyone because of something you could easily change isn't fair to anyone, least of all yourself.

I mean, jesus, talking about killing yourself? You need help, like go to your school and tell them. If you were one of my students and told me that story, I would report it as a serious medical issue.
I don't see how I am being a jerk to people by disagreeing with them.
 

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
I don't see how I am being a jerk to people by disagreeing with them.
You yourself have admitted to having a toxic personality and being unable to cope with people in a normal manner. This you said is from your situation at home, which I don't doubt. Regardless, anyone talking of killing themselves in a public setting should seek help. It isn't something to joke about or throw out randomly.