Jive Turkey
Karen
- 6,722
- 9,087
Just a taste of the delicious post-college reality that awaits herIn this episode, UVA Jackie finds out courts aren't nearly as gullible as clickbait writers posing as journalists.
Just a taste of the delicious post-college reality that awaits herIn this episode, UVA Jackie finds out courts aren't nearly as gullible as clickbait writers posing as journalists.
She was a victim of her own lies. Bringing them up again, re-victimizes her! WHAT'S SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND?!Re-?
As in she was victimized EVER?
Sad the kids are sisters too. =-/. Welcome to Social Justice, where anything can be twisted into a microaggression because objectivity is a tool of the evil white male and all this 'technology' and 'wealth' that said evilness has created (Sorry Asia, Schrodingers race puts you in the minority for this insult).
Well, they certainly know how to trot out the party line like good little parrots.
Ha ha ha Jesus Christ.objectivity is a tool of the evil white male
I know right, the fact that this is actually taught in feminist literatureisa joke.https://books.google.com/books?id=nn...20male&f=false(Objectivity is associated with whiteness and maleness.) This is like basic gender studies Tan, so I hope your laugh was genuine, otherwise you'd be a bad feminist and dislike what is being taught in Gender Studies.Ha ha ha Jesus Christ.
The worst part about him is he doesn't even know what he's defending, he just jumps on it because he's an ideologue. My quote is only shocking for people who don't follow gender studies. We have people WITHIN social sciences, like psychology, really arguing that mathematical symbols are sexist. The fucking glaciers, are sexist. And then you have idiots like Tan who were programmed to defend the movement at all costs uncomfortably laughing as if this really doesn't exist--he's like the this guy at this point...Can amod shaw Tanoomba? This thread was so nice while he was away.
What did I defend this time, Lith? Please enlighten me.The worst part about him is he doesn't even know what he's defending, he just jumps on it because he's an ideologue. My quote is only shocking for people who don't follow gender studies. We have people WITHIN social sciences, like psychology, really arguing that mathematical symbols are sexist. The fucking glaciers, are sexist. And then you have idiots like Tan who were programmed to defend the movement at all costs uncomfortably laughing as if this really doesn't exist--he's like the this guy at this point...
Just until after the elections... in 2024.Can amod shaw Tanoomba? This thread was so nice while he was away.
Oh, and that page you linked in no way reflects your ridiculously exaggerated statement... As usual. I do love how you don't even realize your "No, this is how itreally is!" stance is directly contradicted by your dogged insistence on misrepresenting "them". Lith gonna Lith.
?