And every time I read the term, I look down and sure enough, my legs are apart. It's a natural way of sitting for most men.
Not for Tan, you have to actually have balls to feel discomfort.
Jokes aside, the hypocrisy of manspreading is unreal; one chick who participated in one of those free bleed campaigns was arguing about this. She actually let her period stain her pants (Tricked by a fucking 4chan hashtag LOL) to make a point that she should have complete control over her body. When a guy told her there was no reason for that, that it was more sanitary to use modern products, she grew enraged and said he can't know what's comfortable for HER body...Meanwhile, a few months later she is arguing with men who say they experience discomfort when having to close their legs for long periods of time, trying to explain to them that 'testicles don't work like that'.
The people you're mocking don't reconsider their beliefs because they're being mocked. In fact, people tend to react to being mocked by doubling down, since they feel they're being attacked and don't see "giving in" as an option. People who are on the fence or simply observing don't learn anything from the mockery either, since they see a bunch of obnoxious condescending jackasses and justifiably believe these people aren't a good source for the real story. The only people who benefit from this mocking are the people doing it, in that it boosts their pathetic egos.
You realize shame is an evolutionary tactic that prospered because it is
highly effective at controlling group behavior, right? This entire point is bullshit. And not just your run of the mill bullshit, it directly contradicts observed reality and testing. Even other primate groups, like Bonobos and lower still, like Baboons illustrate strong shaming behavior to curtail bad behaviors in groups.
I'm sure you looked up cognitive dissonance because we make fun of you for it all the time and made up this bullshit from that wiki page to sound extra super duper smart. But you missed the key aspect of that--that it only works in certain conditions where you have a decent enough population of backers. If enough people mock you? It stops working unless you develop a cult. Mocking bad ideas is absolutely
essentialin a functioning society; sometimes it goes too far and is bullying, and as the first article says, that is very damaging. However, in the correct amounts? It's needed to prevent bad behaviors and ideas. In our well meaning fervor to end bullying (Which was a good thing), we accidently classified any challenging thoughts or light mockery for bad ideas into 'harassment' and 'bullying'--this is the result. Censorship, people openly stating extremely racist or sexist rhetoric (Kill all men, I hate whites), and a host of terrible ideas (Glacier science=sexist) that grow more radical and are fostered because everyone is afraid to say 'no, that's fucking stupid'.
Well, it seems we're just about done with that, thank goodness. So welcome to the new world, Tan. Let me join in the glorious new shitlord chorus to say, you're ideas are fucking stupid.