Not sure you fully comprehend how effective this will become.In 2030, society is going to be split into ChatGPT simps and STEM chads.
You overestimate what the current AI can do in S and M portions of STEM. And you also overestimate what future AI will be. This is exactly the same discussion that was had over a decade ago about self driving cars and the results will be exactly the same.Not sure you fully comprehend how effective this will become.
The Chads will lose out every time as well, unless merged, but then every simp that also has merged will just be as good as the “Chads”.
That is what will be so interesting in the near future.
Just think AI vs Lee Sedol, but in STEM!
Yes, eventually it will happen in one form or another.You overestimate what the current AI can do in S and M portions of STEM. And you also overestimate what future AI will be. This is exactly the same discussion that was had over a decade ago about self driving cars and the results will be exactly the same.
Sorry but no, I reckon you are underestimating progress by looking into the past, the rate of improvement is not going to be the same.You overestimate what the current AI can do in S and M portions of STEM. And you also overestimate what future AI will be. This is exactly the same discussion that was had over a decade ago about self driving cars and the results will be exactly the same.
I am looking at it with understanding of what current AI is. And what you just said is exactly the same shit that was said about self driving cars a decade ago and like I said, the outcome will be the same.Sorry but no, I reckon you are underestimating progress by looking into the past, the rate of improvement is not going to be the same.
you are looking at it with a flat line of progression when it is going to be more of a hockey curve upwards.
This discussion is not about self driving cars. This is about chat GPT.I am looking at it with understanding of what current AI is. And what you just said is exactly the same shit that was said about self driving cars a decade ago and like I said, the outcome will be the same.
One thing is certain, whatever you do for a living is the type of a job that is in danger from AI.This discussion is not about self driving cars. This is about chat GPT.
Try to stay on topic instead of going off elsewhere.
There is a reason why I mentioned “Non-manual professions” as I’m aware of the difficulties of real world navigation and battery issues….
Nah.One thing is certain, whatever you do for a living is the type of a job that is in danger from AI.
Nah.
Client: "So yeah, all those meal and entertainment charges are business related. Let's deduct them."
GPT Accountant: ""I'm sorry Hal, but according to your EV's data sensors, you went to an address that is the same as your mistress' house, added a person to the front passenger seat who weighed the same as your mistress, and then took her to an expensive dinner. That does not qualify as a business expense."
Client: "Ok, you got me. "
GPT: "ps.. your tax prep fee is now double. Failure to pay it and the info gets emailed to your wife. Have a nice day."
ftfyThat's never going to happen. When data can really be integrated like that, it will just be piped directly to the NSA, analyzed, forwarded to the IRS, and they'll wait for you to make a mistake, so they can audit and fine you and make even more, thereby justifying their existence.
ftfy
The IRS doesn't even have staff to chase down people who completely fail to file, never mind audit anything but the biggest and most blatant frauds.
By example, this year I declared (legitimately) a $250,000 capital loss on private stock from my wife's previous employer that went belly-up, without any documentation and offsetting six figures in capital gains from stock sales that I used for a house down payment, and they didn't even blink and accepted the return.
About job security. I would think the trades would be the last to go and thus the most secure till the day robots become as mobile in I, Robot.If you want job security get into a field that nothing or very little is written down and instead goes by word of mouth. I am " on retainer" for lack of a better phrase because I ask questions, make notes in the field and talk to old timers like my dad about how they did things you can't see that are inside a furnace, under insulation on a vessel and such. I get paid often to "take a guess" at what is there they can't see.
And once you get audited once, the fear of audit goes away completely and you realize how much room for creativity there is in taxes. Especially once you toss a schedule C and a schedule F on the pile.The IRS doesn't even have staff to chase down people who completely fail to file, never mind audit anything but the biggest and most blatant frauds.
By example, this year I declared (legitimately) a $250,000 capital loss on private stock from my wife's previous employer that went belly-up, without any documentation and offsetting six figures in capital gains from stock sales that I used for a house down payment, and they didn't even blink and accepted the return.
And once you get audited once, the fear of audit goes away completely and you realize how much room for creativity there is in taxes. Especially once you toss a schedule C and a schedule F on the pile.