www.bbc.co.uk
He got the belt first. Like a true ho. Payment up front. (or so I'm told)Rebecca Joynes: Teacher guilty of sex with two boys
Rebecca Joynes is told to expect to go to jail after being convicted by jury.
Kid banged and got a gucci belt? Wtf
AHAHAHHAHA my home town when growing up. I went to the county school but my wife went to the city school. We don't recognize either last name.
2 former GA school employees accused of sex with students
The indictment alleges the two women should have known the students were enrolled as students and what they were doing was violating Georgia law.www.wsbtv.com
It's a small town, we know all the family names. The area I lived at the start of high school we have 413 residents, when I graduated it was 409 lol. I haven't been back in a long time, but did the google earth street view and they one gas station is now gone and that was the "local" grocery as well.
Small world, I went to high school in the town immediately south of there.AHAHAHHAHA my home town when growing up. I went to the county school but my wife went to the city school. We don't recognize either last name.
2 former GA school employees accused of sex with students
The indictment alleges the two women should have known the students were enrolled as students and what they were doing was violating Georgia law.
She packed on the pounds in 6 years. Would have taken a shot at her in 2018 (as a 17 year old boy anyway), not so much now. Now she looks like a lesbian volleyball coach.Life skills teacher arrested 'after having sex with boy, 17'
Robyn Rogers, 44, was arrested on Thursday for the alleged offense - after officers made contact with her at a home on Beefeater Drive in Lake Havasu City, Arizona .www.dailymail.co.uk
That lady needs to be removed from society.What the fuck, an 11 year old?!
View attachment 546095Shocking demand from teacher arrested for making out with student
Madison Bergmann, 24, the suspended elementary school teacher accused of making out with an 11-year-old student, made a shocking demand in court on Thursday.
That's a good one, but I don't understand the hook for the article. As hubby's pics resurface? Was the internet scrubbed of his pics and now they are back? That just doesn't make any sense. I assumed they were lewd and incriminating in some way and had been lost. But no. They barely talked about the hubby pics.
