Occido_foh
shitlord
- 0
- 0
NOt hard to win when all the votes were scripted. Not sure why there wasn"t a limit of 1 or 2 at the most for votes a day.
There"s a reporter dude here in Utah (I cannot for the life of me remember his name) but he does just that. He looks into things like this and then humiliates the party(ies) in question on public TV. Completely shitting on their reputation.EmpireF4i said:What would be really great is to expose the rigged contest and maybe get local TV stations to report it about the radio station.
Nothing wins the internet likestock photographyormature discussion.Valc said:The only thing that bugs me is the homocycle forum thinks they"re actually the reason she won.
I swear to christ I just read that exact line in this thread...Guess when you"re a mouth breather who lives in your mom"s basement...
I can just see one of us meeting with a mysterious figure in a parking garage at night so he can give us a manila envelope describing what really went down.EmpireF4i said:Radio stations have a rep for having rigged contests, dont see why this one is any different. Ive heard radio personalities talking on air about how contests were rigged for big money prizes like trips and cars and what not.
What would be really great is to expose the rigged contest and maybe get local TV stations to report it about the radio station.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:[email protected]
Date: Jul 21, 2009 4:29pm
Subject: Fw: Re: Model Contest was a sham.
To:
CC:
> Further more it is hard for us to make it a sham when the web is run by an outside company. I never even see the votes.
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> From:[email protected]
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:26:27 +0000
> To:
> Subject: Re: Re: Model Contest was a sham.
> Bad press? I have never heard anything but from the past 4 emails. Plus this is for Expose photography movin is just helping promote it.
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> From:
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:25:42 +0000
> To:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Re: Model Contest was a sham.
> Please keep me updated. there is alot of bad press and rumors floating around now about your station and the contest being rigged from the start. Brooke being a "maxim girl" and being paid before the contest just to publicize for the station and is going to win regardless. Also as mentioned before it"s kind of shocking to watch Tasha go from a 70-30 lead to losing by over 1 million votes in less then an hour?? Then the bracket suddenly being closed right after?? seriously?
And then Homer turning on the head lights to his car and yelling "HEY MR. SMITHERS!"Salshun said:I can just see one of us meeting with a mysterious figure in a parking garage at night so he can give us a manila envelope describing what really went down.
You magnificent bastard, I was trying to find the pic. Heh, "Lemme get a ride home!"EmpireF4i said:And then Homer turning on the head lights to his car and yelling "HEY MR. SMITHERS!"
How is the million votes thing being calculated? I just saw percentages on the website.Requiem said:Let"s get the information we have together at least.
When did the mass voting spike occur?
What were the scores before and after?
Final vote count 4.5 to 5.5 million right?
The competition ended late, right? How late?
From what Tyen tells me, she made up nearly 2 million votes in about 30 minutes. Somebody with more firm understanding of the numbers please come up with a "made up x votes in x minutes" for me.
If the 2 million in 30 minutes is correct, it"s probably possible to prove beyond doubt that their webserver(s) couldn"t even process that many votes.
2 million in votes in 30 minutes? Even if she got all 4chan, SA, PA, and FOHSS members currently logged in at the time to vote for her, wouldn"t have been possible.Requiem said:Let"s get the information we have together at least.
When did the mass voting spike occur?
What were the scores before and after?
Final vote count 4.5 to 5.5 million right?
The competition ended late, right? How late?
From what Tyen tells me, she made up nearly 2 million votes in about 30 minutes. Somebody with more firm understanding of the numbers please come up with a "made up x votes in x minutes" for me.
If the 2 million in 30 minutes is correct, it"s probably possible to prove beyond doubt that their webserver(s) couldn"t even process that many votes.
If they were the numbers given by , yeah, they"re bullshit.Szlia said:I am pretty sure the vote figure is just from a conspiracy theory post made after the fail.