Alan Arkin, Robert DeNiro, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Tommy Lee Jones..........yeah he's got a free ticket sitting in that group. /eyerollStandard manipulating of awards.
If Waltz was put up for lead actor, he'd be going against Daniel Day Lewis in Lincoln.
Putting him in "supporting actor" ought to be a free win on the other hand.
I may be wrong, but I think there is no rule to determine if a part is lead or supporting. It's the producers who enter the actor in the category they see fit (usually the one they feel s/he is the most likely to win) or at the very least lobby for the actor in a category or the other (Academy mailings and Variety adds with 'For your consideration, Christoph Waltz as best actor in a supporting role, for his part in Django Unchained yadda yadda').As far as Oscar shit, it sort of annoys me that Waltz is only considered a supporting actor in this. I understand that Foxx is technically the main role/actor, but that movie is nothing without Waltz's character. I get why it is categorized that way, but it still annoys me.
http://bcove.me/sfugj0baPromoting Oscar-nominated Django Unchained, which had its premiere in London last night, Quentin Tarantino refused to repeat his position on violence in movies during an interview with Channel 4 Evening News host Krishnan Guru-Murthy. Asked about the link between movie violence and real violence, Tarantino responds in the video below: "Don't ask me a question like that - I'm not biting." When asked why, he says, "Because I refuse your question. I'm not your slave and you're not my master. You can't make me dance to your tune. I'm not a monkey." Saying he was doing the interview as "a commercial for the movie," Tarantino elaborates, "I don't want to talk about the implications of violence. The reason I don't want to talk about it: cause I've said everything I have to say about it. If anyone cares what I have to say about it, they can Google me and they can look for 20 years what I have to say. But I haven't changed my opinion one iota." Guru-Murthy later presses, "But you haven't said why you think there's no relationship", to which Tarantino exclaims, "It's none of your damn business what I think about that!. And I'm shutting you down." The exchange in question begins at about the 4:30 mark:
I'm glad someone else appreciates this. The way Waltz disapprovingly told Django to take his hat off the table gave me a real kick too.MEH!
Waltz killed it in this one. He was so god damn entertaining to watch. He made the whole movie. It was a great movie, but he really carried it along and kept it entertaining. All his little things, like when the Marshal had Waltz come out of the saloon, and he's about to surrended, and he's pointing at his warrant while his hands are raised. It was just so fun to watch.
I don't think his character is naive. I think at the start he's reserved, afraid and green and at the end he's reserved, aggressive and smart.the trailers made it seem like the movie was going to culminate in the killing of the 3 brothers.
people have been critical of foxx's performance but i think the issue is that the character is reserved and naive and played opposite someone who is outspoken and brimming with confidence.