That is not what Chuk said. Honestly sounds like Cosby took advantage of his fame and was a casting couch OG. They gave up that ass and probably got nothing or little for it. They were humiliated.
Ok but, what do you do? What are we to make of this? "Keep an eye on Bill because shit is suspicous" ? Yes, absolutely. Then what?
Well, you didn't, quite. The serious accusations are the ones that involve him drugging them unwillingly and having sex with them or molesting them while they were knocked out or dazed. You seem to think all Cosby was doing was getting "some strange". So I just connected the dots.
No you don't. If you want him to be found guilty in a court of law you do, but if you just want people to know that he did it, words are just fine.
see it's not just "At the time" it's throughout all of recorded human history for all I know
a police report for starters. its awfully convenient for these women to wait for the statute of limitations to run out so they can make any claim thy want and not have to worry about being charged for filing a false police report.
am i? why is lena dunham protecting the identity of the person who allegedly raped her?
Again, the Lena Dunham case is totally different from these. Lena Dunham wrote a book, tried to use this as publicity to sell her book. Not only that, but even by her account, it wasn't rape. That is totally different from people coming forward, with no financial motivation, to make accusations that if true are CLEARLY rape.
Now I'm not saying this is the case, but if you're a famous and charming black man, perhaps you enjoy getting tail. Perhaps you also enjoy getting the girls relaxed with a stiff drink. Perhaps the girls don't like how he treated them, and regret it afterwards. With the color of 30 years, perhaps one of them comes up with the idea that she was drugged, and with the kind of numbers Bill probably pulled, there are probably a few more that want to believe they were drugged too because they regret their actions, there's nothing to lose now and only publicity and money to gain, and maybe they don't really remember what happened anyway.
it is not absurd to equate the two. both made rape claims with no evidence of anything happening at all. the latest accuser(s) sold her/their story/stories to vanity fair. dont give me that shit about these women not trying to cash in.
If we came up with 30-40 people that are willing to "just let people know what you did" how would that feel? No reason, no lawsuit, no monetary compensation, just to "let the people know." Are you saying that would be ok?
