bralkan
The old ways are still best
- 332
- 384
Thinking about term limits, I wonder if this would have the downside of making politicians less powerful and less able to stand against big money. If you're a 20 year incumbent housemember of a fairly happy district, your chances for re-election are so high and your campaign costs are so low that you don't really need big money to back you. But if you're a nobody, you either need to bring a lot of money to the table or need to give your loyalty to someone.
Late reply is late. Sorry.
Term limits sound great, and I am 100% with the sentiment behind them, but term limits alone may actually make things worse. I imagine the result would only end up strengthening the party apparatus (see parliamentary systems) and the lobbyists.
Corruption of the system is going to need far more systemic changes than just term limits on Congress.
We need a better approach to cultivating “non-career” politicians.
Personally, I’d remove all compensation and provide military-style housing and support. They shouldn’t (and can’t, to rule fairly) have “better” lives than the majority of people they are serving.
I don't know - but I would just caution against thinking that term limits are some kind of panacea.