I didn't say I haven't been stunned while casting FD, sure I have. What I am saying is that I've never encountered a situation where a group or raid wiped because I got stunned. I'm sure I've died before at some point because some mob stunned me when I was trying to cast FD, but again, I don't really see how this equates to "if you're not an Ogre you're wrong."
Who cares and why does it matter if I die in a group scenario?I was lvl 50 on Agnarr as an SK by the end of the 2nd day, and ditto for Mangler and Aradune (took me a bit longer on Aradune b/c of server problems and I didn't play as much in general), but I can't really imagine that if I had chosen Ogre instead of SK, I somehow would have... leveled up faster, or been any better or worse off than I was by choosing to go DE. Again, it's a pretty marginal/fringe benefit. It's nice to have, but it's not like "if you don't do this you're a failure at your class."
I'd say something like... if you're a rogue and you're not using a piercing weapon thus not able to backstab, you're wrong. To say not being an Ogre means you're wrong is just nonsensical.
I don't even think it's a min-max thing, because if I wanted to min-max, I'd probably go for DE instead of Ogre so I could max mana for DPS. As you and others have stated, there's very little that an SK is main tanking in Classic-Luclin, and during POP raid encounters where an SK would tank, lack of stun immunity doesn't matter... so really as an SK you probably want to max DPS. I'd be more inclined to say that if you're not a DE you're doing it wrong than I would to say you're doing it wrong as a non-Ogre. But again -- at the end of the day, I think player skill (and by this I mean, doing very small marginal things like timing spells/dots between swings and things to really max your character) is more important than just picking a certain race. As Foaming has said, people like Sazzabi are recognized as top tier SK and he doesn't play DE or Ogre.
I just think Ogres are big, fat, and ugly and I prefer DE