Incorrect sir. There are many types of fertilizer. The commonality is usually a molecule containing Nitrogen or Potassium in a form ready for uptake by plants. This facility was supposed to store anhydrous ammonia or NH3. Anhydrous ammonia is stored as a pressurized liquid. If the pressure is ever released it quickly vaporizes. It is not super dangerous because it tends to disperse quickly and is hard to ignite. The plant would use this as a source to either make solid ammonium salts or as a water/ammonia solution for fertilization.I dont understand this.
No shit there was ammonium nitrate at a fertilizer plant/dept.
Its like an electric plant having electricity.
I think it is for when someone blows up something with fertilizer from this place, they can figure out where it came from in a hopes to track down the people responsible? As far as DHS is concerned.I don't see how whether they reported their shit to DHS or did not matters. Is DHS responsible for ensuring that industry and agriculture is up to safety standards?
No, but after 9/11 DHS got put in charge of ensuring that large stocks of hazardous chemicals were stored in secure facilities. Everything from ethanol to certain stores of metals to ammonium nitrate is on the list, with an threshold for notifying the DHS that you are in possession of.I don't see how whether they reported their shit to DHS or did not matters. Is DHS responsible for ensuring that industry and agriculture is up to safety standards?
Anhydrous ammonia makes ammonium nitrate. If a fertilizer factory has Anhydrous ammonia, they are making ammonium nitrate. If its a depot for supplying farmer, its going to ahve ammonium nitrate, becuase farmers don't use ammonia itself.Incorrect sir. There are many types of fertilizer. The commonality is usually a molecule containing Nitrogen or Potassium in a form ready for uptake by plants. This facility was supposed to store anhydrous ammonia or NH3. Anhydrous ammonia is stored as a pressurized liquid. If the pressure is ever released it quickly vaporizes. It is not super dangerous because it tends to disperse quickly and is hard to ignite. The plant would use this as a source to either make solid ammonium salts or as a water/ammonia solution for fertilization.
Ammonium Nitrate on the other hand is pretty dangerous. The formula is [NH4][NO3]. The big difference is the oxygen. Since a fire requires oxygen to combust, if you are storing the Ammonia (NH3) in a tank, there is little air for it to combust with. If the tank has a rupture the liquid will push out of it as a gas and not let oxygen into the tank to cause an explosion. Ammonium Nitrate, however, is a solid. It is stored in large bins or sacks with air all around. Heck, the thing that makes it dangerous IS the oxygen in the nitrate, because it can act as its' own oxidizer. It needs a fire or detonation source to get going though, which is what inspectors are going to be looking for.
I dont know which substance started burning first, but I imagine what occured was that one of theanhydrous tanks had a rupture and started burning. You can see how the wind in the video is pushing the fire along a straight vertical, which might be a tank gassing off ammonia. The firefighters would have no idea that they would need to be ammonium nitrate in the area that they needed to push the fire source away from, trusting in the other tanks to keep the rest of the anhydrous safe. Eventually some fire got to the ammonia causing the explosion seen to the left in the camera phone video and then blowing apart the anhydrous tanks o the right which are now exposed to a rushing mass of air and add to the explosion.
I did read the article, what about it is misleading in the context of my post? I wasn't insinuating that it is the DHS's responsibility to inform fire departments of dangerous industrial operations in their area. I frankly don't know the mechanics of how a fire department would go about collecting that information. I just think it would be pretty self evident that most fire departments would maintain some sort of inventory of those kinds of things in their area, and have contingency plans to deal with incidents at them, whether outright fires or other chemical releases, spills etc. Otherwise they'd pretty much be suicidal in responding to any fires at industrial facilities by going in blind.I'm sure the DHS, the model of bureaucracy that it is, makes sure that all emergency services are aware of local dangers. No doubt, none at all.
Fogel, Caliene, Eomer - read the article before commenting. That quote he put up is very misleading.
You're right, you would think local firehouses would have knowledge of additional dangers in their area of responsibility. I don't disagree that this is logical. However I was speaking within the context that informing the DHS would some how make a difference in whether said firefighters had that knowledge or not. Since you responded to that train of thought, it seemed safe to assume you were disagreeing with me on that point. Apparently you do agree.I did read the article, what about it is misleading in the context of my post? I wasn't insinuating that it is the DHS's responsibility to inform fire departments of dangerous industrial operations in their area. I frankly don't know the mechanics of how a fire department would go about collecting that information. I just think it would be pretty self evident that most fire departments would maintain some sort of inventory of those kinds of things in their area, and have contingency plans to deal with incidents at them, whether outright fires or other chemical releases, spills etc. Otherwise they'd pretty much be suicidal in responding to any fires at industrial facilities by going in blind.
Fire burning something it shouldn't.So any word on what actually caused the explosion?
It's actually the companies responsibility to provide local fire department with a list of all dangers at your plant in Texas, also, stop being a stereotyping piece of shit.Nah, I'm pretty sure any fire department worth a shit keeps an inventory of potentially dangerous buildings/plants so they don't walk in to a dynamite factory without knowing it. Then again, that might make too much sense for Texas.
Hey look guys, an angry Texan. How rare.It's actually the companies responsibility to provide local fire department with a list of all dangers at your plant in Texas, also, stop being a stereotyping piece of shit.