I'll be the first to admit that there are some parts of math which are taught badly or unintuitively. But the listed new method just seems like a solution looking for a problem. Sure, it's easier to show your work, but it seems much harder to visualize or do all in your head.
No one shaved below the belt in the 70's.hi im 12 whats shaving. Seriously people
I'll be the first to admit that sometimes I don't understand what my daughter brings home. Especially when the problems ask for an explanation. But at the same time I see her doing things like division in 1st grade (it's masked as something else, but it was definitely division) and I really just think there's a lot of butthurt parents out there who think all kids learn the same, which was how things were done when they grew up.I'll be the first to admit that there are some parts of math which are taught badly or unintuitively. But the listed new method just seems like a solution looking for a problem. Sure, it's easier to show your work, but it seems much harder to visualize or do all in your head.
Honestly, i can't make heads or tails of how this supposed "new way" works. I've never even heard of this. Can anyone explain it?
Here's my guess:Honestly, i can't make heads or tails of how this supposed "new way" works. I've never even heard of this. Can anyone explain it?
whoever came up with the "new" way should be shotHere's my guess:
Start at 12, add 3 to make it 15 (divisible by 5).
Add another five to get it to next number divisible by 5 (20).
Add 10 to get it to 30 (last number divisible by five).
Add 2 to get to desired number (32).
Take all addition numbers (+3, +5, +10, +2) and add them together to get answer (20).
I tried it again with a different equation:
57 - 14 = ?
14 + 1 = 15
15 + 5 = 20
20+ 35 = 55
55 + 2 = 57
1 + 5 + 35 + 2 = 43