Frenzied Wombat
Potato del Grande
UA-V pilots. Most of the drone pilots in Israel are female I'm told.isnt there any combat role in the military that a woman can fill?
UA-V pilots. Most of the drone pilots in Israel are female I'm told.isnt there any combat role in the military that a woman can fill?
For me personally or the DoD?Why focus on ground robotics when flying robotics has grown in leaps and bounds?
So you're saying you need an armored exoskeleton to walk around Detroit?To the first, because that's how I'm currently employed and because I live in Detroit.
Yea I've seen that movie before though:So you're saying you need an armored exoskeleton to walk around Detroit?
I think everything that's not specifically designed to carry cargo will go that route but I don't know how you can get around the massive energy cost of adding pounds in cargo onto drones if you want to keep them close-support focused (ie, quadrotors). I'm sure we'll have automated resupply drones soon enough which will be able to use composites and massive wingspans to get lift but those don't avoid obstacles very well.Yeah on the halt you can ground the drone and have solar recharge it, things like that. The field is growing huge compared to ground robotics. I get why you want more ground Tuco and it isn't bad but I think for once the DoD wants to "skip a tech generation" and go straight to flying as much as possible.
Tuco is the one with hands-on industry knowledge, but there are still areas that I'd think ground based robots would excel at. Being able to let ground drones sit idle or loiter in an area w/o necessarily needing them piloted and running at full power might be one advantage. Or giving them automated tasks that air drones can't do, like mapping out minefields or having them actually /suicide mines (like, think cheap aquatic ALLAH AKBAR drones that we can send out to remove South Korean naval mines). Area denial might be another area: say, put a drone with a machine gun in a field. It can sit there for extended periods of time, possibly without direct control or oversight (think sitting inactive until something within its observed area triggers motion sensors). Have it send out an alarm so Joe Schmoe can log into it remotely and see if there is a credible target or threat, and then choose to engage or observe. Or garrison borders with UGVs, armed or unarmed. One of our biggest challenges in Iraq was not having the manpower to seal the borders, and if a unit moved in and cleared a border town, as soon as they left insurgents would move back in.Why focus on ground robotics when flying robotics has grown in leaps and bounds?
Or better yet, grenade-drones that have a little speaker that says 'Allahu Ackbar' before detonating in the face of the enemy.
Now this could be amazing. They could bring back fuel. They could mate up and tether in as solar panels to charge themselves and the ground drone.I'd like to see ground drones mated with small aerial drones. Drive the "mother" drone out somewhere with a complement of aerial drones that it can launch and recover.
No, autonomy is finally getting big in the automotive industry.So you're saying you need an armored exoskeleton to walk around Detroit?
I've seen this before and it's pretty fun because it combines the advantages of both platforms. I'm on a project now that is ALMOST perfect for this but has a few aspects that make it impossible.I'd like to see ground drones mated with small aerial drones. Drive the "mother" drone out somewhere with a complement of aerial drones that it can launch and recover. Maybe use that mother drone (UGV or otherwise) to collect and recharge those drones (assuming some sort of ability for aerial drones to return). I mean, I dunno. Someone will think of something revolutionary, but at times I think what will be truly revolutionary will be the role/use that they come up with for drones rather than some sort of futuristic piece of tech on it's own.