Harshaw
Throbbing Member
- 26,791
- 142,165
^Can't read or doesn't understand how confirmation bias works.
Look, I'm about as resistant as they come (as a straight white male anyways) when it comes to DEI bullshiat, but when you have Game developers actively not hiring white people and couple that with the huge increase in game development costs, you get projects ONLY getting made if the investors see companies like Sweet Baby Inc are involved to race swap and generally use a racial / diversity checklist at the expense of story.
A steam curator is up to almost 400,000 gamers fed up with this checklist bullshit. Steam Curator: Sweet Baby Inc detected
Also look at the stupid controversy surrounding Stellar Blade, a South Korean game that did nothing wrong, but we can't have a hot girl in a game anymore. That's it. It's a purity spiral out of control, and I'm sick of them uglifying classic female characters, or neutering formerly powerful white male characters just to boost the diversity hire.
IJustWantToPlayGames.jpg !!!
You've turned confirmation bias into an entire religion.Thanks for literally illustrating my point.
You've turned being completely retarded into a life-style. You don't even know the meaning of words you use.You've turned confirmation bias into an entire religion.
You've turned confirmation bias into an entire religion.
What exactly is your stance on DEI in gaming studios? You bitch at ppl who dislike it, so I guess you support it?You've turned confirmation bias into an entire religion.
How do you get that from her post? I honestly can't understand.If you're trying to argue that it's bad that people think DEI is bad, you're doing a shitty job of it.
He's not gonna fuck you bro.How do you get that from her post? I honestly can't understand.
Essentially all Mist said is that not every failed company failed because of DEI and/or solely because of DEI (which implicitly allows that some did fail because of DEI). That doesn't seem like that crazy a statement, since many companies folded before DEI was all the rage. Business success is no easy thing. Yet, too many people will go out of their way to misread anything she writes so they can make like a moth to a flame.
If you disagree and feel that every failed company is because of DEI, make that your rebuttal. Nowhere in that post did she make the argument you're implying she made.
Of course not every failed company is because of DEI. I mean, it probably doesn't help, but most companies are able to fail entirely on their own.How do you get that from her post? I honestly can't understand.
Essentially all Mist said is that not every failed company failed because of DEI and/or solely because of DEI (which implicitly allows that some did fail because of DEI). That doesn't seem like that crazy a statement, since many companies folded before DEI was all the rage. Business success is no easy thing. Yet, too many people will go out of their way to misread anything she writes so they can make like a moth to a flame.
If you disagree and feel that every failed company is because of DEI, make that your rebuttal. Nowhere in that post did she make the argument you're implying she made.
My point is that most companies and most products fail. But people only pick up on the failures that align with their agenda. That's how confirmation bias works.What exactly is your stance on DEI in gaming studios? You bitch at ppl who dislike it, so I guess you support it?
How do you get that from her post? I honestly can't understand.
Essentially all Mist said is that not every failed company failed because of DEI and/or solely because of DEI (which implicitly allows that some did fail because of DEI). That doesn't seem like that crazy a statement, since many companies folded before DEI was all the rage. Business success is no easy thing. Yet, too many people will go out of their way to misread anything she writes so they can make like a moth to a flame.
If you disagree and feel that every failed company is because of DEI, make that your rebuttal. Nowhere in that post did she make the argument you're implying she made.
I think the broader question is whether DEI contributes and doesn't contribute to a company going under, what the fuck do you care? If it's truly the cause of some horrific malady in the gaming space, the market will clearly show that to them. As it seems to already be doing with so many "AAA" games completely losing their ass recently.Sure, just because a company fails with DEI doesn't mean it failed because of it.
But is DEI saving any companies? Is it actually making s single company or product better? I would say no, but I'm open to arguements.
If you assume the premise DEI isn't helping any company or product, then every company that folds with DEI, even if not because of it, wasn't helped by DEI. Then the question becomes without DEI would they have had freed up resources or focus or better products that could have kept them from folding.
There are a million little things that aren't the sole cause of a business going under, but contribute to it going under. Saying DEI didn't cause a studio to fold isn't a complete argument. If it's present and not helping then direct cause or not it was either a contributing factor or a red flag of other issues being present.
I've yet to see a single arguement DEI actually helps anything, which is why we instead get cheap pseudo arguments from trolltards that argue DEI can't be proven as the sole cause of a failure.
Argue DEI helps and then an actual discussion can be had.