Here in Nevada, where that shit is legal in many counties, most of the girls also have to get tested monthly. So, yeah, your average whore tends to be a safer bet than your typical bar slut. That"s why Gator"s bitches better be wearing jimmies!Wrathcaster said:Funny enough, actual whores in some places/establishments make you wear a rubber for shit most dudes never do, i.e. when you"re getting a blowjob. Not that I"m seriously positing that fucking prostitutes is by any means safe sex, but I ask you this: how often have you worn a condom when a chick wanted to give you head?
In a way, fucking a window girl in Amsterdam might be safer than banging the average lady back in the States, if you define "safe sex" as always wearing a condom (and I mean, always, for everything).
In sum, fuck hookers to avoid STDs.
I wasn"t using it in a serious way, the same way I wasn"t literally telling anyone to seize the day. Text is a bad way to use that word jokingly. forgive meSutekh said:Please tell me you just didn"t use yolo...
I"m whatever you want me to be, big boy.Sutekh said:I can never remember, are you the gay one?
tested monthly doesn"t really sound all that safe, if she gets tested on the 1st of the month and you bang her on the 30th after she"s had 400 johns as far as your concerned she might as well not have been tested in the first place. Hell even if you"re the 2nd guy to fuck her after her test, the test won"t matter if that first guy gave her aids.Kirun said:Here in Nevada, where that shit is legal in many counties, most of the girls also have to get tested monthly. So, yeah, your average whore tends to be a safer bet than your typical bar slut. That"s why Gator"s bitches better be wearing jimmies!
SOP procedure here is that if you even have the symptoms they"ll give you 4x250mg of whatever antibiotics that you take all at once, and then a week later they give you the test results yay or nay. I guess that big shot of antibiotics wipes everything out real good, but fuck does it play hell with my stomach.Chlamydia is the least of your worries, when it comes to STIs. Take some antibiotics for a week and you"re done.
I agree that monthly seems a little long, but keep in mind they"re using condoms religiously. That hugely reduces the risk right off the start.Kovaks said:tested monthly doesn"t really sound all that safe, if she gets tested on the 1st of the month and you bang her on the 30th after she"s had 400 johns as far as your concerned she might as well not have been tested in the first place. Hell even if you"re the 2nd guy to fuck her after her test, the test won"t matter if that first guy gave her aids.
If I remember well from blood donation, the window period is around one month anyways and can vary, so she could get infected on the 1st, get tested on the 30th, still be flagged as negative and infect dudes for a whole month more!Eomer said:I agree that monthly seems a little long, but keep in mind they"re using condoms religiously. That hugely reduces the risk right off the start.
And how often is your local bar slut getting tested? That"s what I thought. Look, I"m not saying prostitutes are the epitome of STD free, but in comparison? Yeah, they"re pretty fucking clean. Religious use of condoms plus monthly testing is miles better than anything most of us have banged.Kovaks said:tested monthly doesn"t really sound all that safe, if she gets tested on the 1st of the month and you bang her on the 30th after she"s had 400 johns as far as your concerned she might as well not have been tested in the first place. Hell even if you"re the 2nd guy to fuck her after her test, the test won"t matter if that first guy gave her aids.
Oh your arbitary definition of "natural" makes me wrong! Oh no.Eomer said:It"s called "natural selection." What exactly is "natural" about reproductive and survival pressures in modern human society, you fucking moron? There"s nothing natural about the selective pressures currently at work on the human genome.
Straight guys don"t get AIDS from heterosexual sex, so you don"t need to sweat it.Kovaks said:tested monthly doesn"t really sound all that safe, if she gets tested on the 1st of the month and you bang her on the 30th after she"s had 400 johns as far as your concerned she might as well not have been tested in the first place. Hell even if you"re the 2nd guy to fuck her after her test, the test won"t matter if that first guy gave her aids.
We need more British people on this board so us Americans don"t assume you"re all as stupid as you.Chris said:Oh your arbitary definition of "natural" makes me wrong! Oh no.
Nothing natural about them tool using monkies surviving either then? I guess that you stop evolving once you start using tools? Our ancestors must have been really slow.
Actually even anal with a chick has a pretty low chance of transmitting the virus. Unless you"ve got sores or cuts on your dick. It"s the receiver in male anal sex that is most at risk, not the giver. Circumcision also reduces the risk of transmission.Kovaks said:Also please clarify when you say heterosexual sex do you mean vaginal, i would consider anal with a lady heterosexual and I"m pretty sure you can Get aids from anal with boys or girls it is vaginal that is mostly safe.
Well transmission is easier than that. You"re right that it"s not a certainty but don"t think there isn"t a risk factor for unprotected heterosexual sex with an infected person as long as you"re not banging in the ass.TheCutlery said:In short, unless you"re taking it in the ass from people you don"t trust on a regular basis, AIDS just isn"t a problem.