He is very recognizable.I don't think it was a waste... It was an important plot point... But it could have been anyone. I mean Robert Redford isn't even recognizable as himself anymore anyways. Half way through the movie my wife gasped when she realized who it was
what people look good that were born in the 1930's for christ sake? Still looks like Redford even in his worst photos. And I think that has more to do with Make up then photoshopThat picture of Redford is so misleading and photoshopped. He's craggy as fuck now and it showed in the movie. Looks like Clint Eastwood fucked a raisin and they left their baby in tub too long.
All I said was the publicity still posted above wasn't a good example of what he looks like. You can still suck his liverspotted dick all you want.what people look good that were born in the 1930's for christ sake? Still looks like Redford even in his worst photos. And I think that has more to do with Make up then photoshop
How much have you had to drink tonight? Your posts are more confusing and nonsensical than usual.yes, yes lets just all agree, 78, and not in a nursing home, still working =handclap.
what? he's 78 yrs young, he deserves a handclap for not looking likeHow much have you had to drink tonight? Your posts are more confusing and nonsensical than usual.