You're retarded.should retard rickshaw soysauce flunk and micauly caulkin for a week.
^ ^Whatever. I don't see a problem with anything he talked about other than the assault weapons ban.
It is a play on emotions, but he's doing it because it works, even on him. For his first term, and even after the Giffords shooting and Batman shooting, Obama basically left gun rights alone. Then, 20 kids get riddled with bullets and that's when he finally caved to pressure from the left to "do something". The fact that people died wasn't what tipped the scales. The fact that it was kids, was. So yea, sticking a bunch of kids in front of the camera is a play on emotions, but if you're trying to influence public opinion, if it worked on Obama, it'll work on most of the Joes sitting at home.Any point worth it's salt doesn't require a room full of children and manufactured tears. I actually don't mind giving concessions to gun control, but all this play on emotion is over the top.
Should we bring in a bunch of kids that suck at Math to illustrate the failing educational system for the next presser?
This is actually probably correct. The Newtown shooting influenced a lot of people. I had actually forgotten about how many shootings there were last year until he started talking about them, and I didn't realize that 70 people got shot in Aurora, what the fuck. But yeah, kids make people have a feel.It is a play on emotions, but he's doing it because it works, even on him. For his first term, and even after the Giffords shooting and Batman shooting, Obama basically left gun rights alone. Then, 20 kids get riddled with bullets and that's when he finally caved to pressure from the left to "do something". The fact that people died wasn't what tipped the scales. The fact that it was kids, was. So yea, sticking a bunch of kids in front of the camera is a play on emotions, but if you're trying to influence public opinion, if it worked on Obama, it'll work on most of the Joes sitting at home.