You tried to imply something, there's direct statements to the contrary of what you implied. Period. You took an abbreviated statement and tried to make it into something it wasn't - which even careful reading of the article rather than the headline hinted heavily at.
Again, still waiting on one dose of direct quotable evidence that your implication had ANY accuracy.
I will admit if you don't understand the times that numbers are actually collected from employers and such (which most people outside of HR and administration likely don't understand - maybe CPAs now too since it's tied in with taxes some now - that's after I retired however) that's not entirely your fault and it's an easy mistake to made because you don't understand that Medicare & Medicaid reports at one time (sometime in January - I think Jan 1 but not 100% sure TBH) and employer based insurance doesn't report until the middle of the year. [I'm not sure about other variants - but those are two of the most major - and frankly, ideally most of the people leaving would be going to employer plans is the hope of most people anyhow