- Like when trying to advance on ladder, you want to use the deck that has highest % win rate against the majority of decks you'll face.
wow.. you really never comprehended that was the exact point I made.
YOU said
Just gotta figure out what has highest winrate vs Shaman and go with it I imagine.
Which is what I was responding to.
It was never an analogy for the current meta, it's a way to understand how metas change when wins/losses and eliminations are introduced during an event or tournament. I oversimplified the math to make it easier to comprehend, but you still got it wrong and now are acting superior while simultaneously not understanding what was said.
It has nothing to do with MTG itself, it has to do with predicting a meta over the course of a multi-round event, which does apply. It'd be like saying an ELO system only applies to chess. MTG doesn't have 100% winrate decks either.
When you want to really predict the performance of decks, you have to input their actual winrates against each deck, and how many of each deck is involved. That's where things like vicious syndicate's data report comes in, and exactly what they are trying to model. However, you have to combine the winrate graph with the frequency chart to figure out the best overall deck, which is shaman right now.
As for the above statement about playing the best deck against shaman. The answer to that question is freeze or aggro mage, but both are only about 55% against midrange shaman, and shaman is only 14% of the meta right now across all ranks. Even if you factor in that their winrate is being brought down by bad players playing a complicated deck, there's no way it's higher then 60-65% and they also have some really horrible matchups against relatively popular decks, so they still aren't a clear choice.
Until someone finds a new deck to really crush midrange shaman, or beat the rest of the field at a similar rate as them, it's still be the best deck to play for the moment.