I don't know what you're talking about. I have a Warrior deck that does really well and I only have 1 Warsong in there and it's not even important. Most of the times I drop it to make them freak out and force their removal on it. There's so many different types of great Warrior decks that don't rely on Warsong.
It's too harsh for sure and I probably won't play it anymore, but people saying it was the only good Warrior card or the staple etc. are being dramatic.
I don't have cairne yet, I think it is worth discussing deing sylvanas for cairne. Cairne you get another 4/5 if he's not silenced. Sylvanas you may get nothing or you may get a 2/1 or something; look at how strong harvest golem is because of his death rattle.
I feel like that then I'll watch the streamers go 0 and 15 and realize everyone gets bad starts or bad hands.
Its weird how this game works, some nights it seems like nothing can go wrong and then others you go full tilt, your opponent always has the right card and every single random element doesn't go your way. Last night was one of those nights for me. Like playing 4 druids in a row so I switch to slow control pally deck and then face a mirror match to lose by 1 hp after both players have gone through all our cards and then aggro decks that have just enough to finish me off when the first deck I was playing fares much better against aggro decks.
It is more that a Shaman can be built to deal with one kind of deck but then auto-loses to everything else. Like a Paladin can cheap minions+consecrate+weapons to deal with rush and it can Aldor+Equality+Divine Shields to deal with late game, but all of that fits in the same deck and works vs both. So a Paladin can win in all match ups with decent odds. A Shaman can get those odds only in one match up and only by sacrificing all others. Kind of sucks.
Yeah it also puts cards on the table in the wrong place, happens when you click and drag cards(I think)
