Hearthstone

jooka

marco esquandolas
<Bronze Donator>
15,397
6,670
Ya, I'm torn mostly between paladin and priest but now I'm thinking hunter as well
 

Arch

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,036
25
Priest is good but so dependent on your combos (assuming you are running a "standard" deck) Paladin so strong but you can bet basically everyone will be running at least 1 anti Pally deck.
 

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
It's happened to me and I won the match, but I had a polymorph or a hex or something. I was just teasing you though because you were acting like it was some big unlikely thing.
 

Tortfeasor

Molten Core Raider
1,014
199
Drafting them and drawing them both in the first 5 turns with no other demons is unlikely, even if it's not wtfmindblowing rare. Typical of my arena RNG of late, though.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
I notice most of the cards they previewed are to counter control, and mid range, but agro is largely untouched.

Who cares if you can clear the board when there is nothing on the board to begin with, or the damage was already done.


They need minions in the game that can absorb spells, and hero powers. I Said this from the start of hearthstone, and all they ever introduce is the same old shit...
 

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
27,899
30,684
Hello hello hello

frown.png
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
What's terrible is how easy I can win with Hunter, and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. I don't see this changing for the next xpac, in fact Hunters always get cards every round that make them stronger.

Like I said they need minions on the board that can absorb a certain amount of spell damage then die. They can base them off Death Knight abilities if they have too

Anti Magic shield etc
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,438
53,911
Ugh, Nefarian is such a Timmy card. It's cute but that effect is nowhere near strong enough to justify the 9 cost.
 

Ortega

Vyemm Raider
1,204
2,776
Ugh, Nefarian is such a Timmy card. It's cute but that effect is nowhere near strong enough to justify the 9 cost.
Yeah I'm not sure how they see that card getting play. Therandomspells it steals could be free, and even then it wouldn't be that great. Especially considering 99% of my games are against mech mage/face hunter where this card would be dead.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Yeah but its a 6/4 tho and it has no death rattle.. There's so many better cards to put in that slot for turn 4, and you waste maybe 1-2 damage?

In Mid range imo it's better to have cards that work for you
 

Valishar

Molten Core Raider
766
424
Drake could fit in a zoo deck, I trade my 2/1's into your butcher and get a 2-3 mana 6/4, but it's not really great. Neferian is about on par with Onyxia at 9 mana, which isn't really playable due to the cost. And the crusher is a win more card.

Drake is also pretty good in arena where 90% of the game is just trading up your minions for his minions until you have board control.
 

Ortega

Vyemm Raider
1,204
2,776
Volcanic Drake could definitely see play, it would not be too difficult to get it down on turn 4. Drakonid seems too win more.
I'm not sure I agree with the win more comment. Seems to me it will further agro as most people usually stabalize around 15 health and then start to come back as the agro decks run out of steam, but if they draw this on turns 3-6 you're looking at a behemoth of a minion to deal with if you don't have BGH.