Mikey78_sl
shitlord
- 96
- 1
In the middle of a draft right now. Went 2-0 in round one. For some reason they let me draft 5 buccaneers and 3 burns
. I have a good feeling about this one.
went 2-0, 2-0, 2-0 last night. If you see buccaneers, take them.In the middle of a draft right now. Went 2-0 in round one. For some reason they let me draft 5 buccaneers and 3 burns. I have a good feeling about this one.
What are the exactly sueing over?Welp, looks like Wizards is finally suing the shit out of Hex.
Wizards of the Coast Files Complaint Against Cryptozoic Entertainment and Hex Entertainment for Copyright, Patent and Trade Dress Infringement | company.wizards.com
I don't know anything about these type of games. When you say copy do you mean very similar or just a down right copy of an actual card form artwork to name? We have seen mechanics, classes, art styles and just about everything else copied in video games since the start and I can't recall anyone getting sued for it unless it was using code or some of the shit that happens with mobile games.Trippy, was just wondering the other day if WOTC was going to give them grief - they are known for it after all. To be fair, some of the cards I've seen are copies of cards WOTC released over a decade ago (nevermind all the copied mechanics and systems), so might be an uphill battle.
That definition of "copied" has no hope of winning anything. Which is a good thing, because being able to copyright 'a unit with 2 attack' would be unbelievably stupid and disruptive.When I say copied, I mean, I'm looking at a green card that costs 1 colorless, 1 green, for a 2/2 creature. I think I even saw a Serra Angel ripoff. Plus more iirc. I'm not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV, but I think it makes your case harder that you're not stepping on their patents when you are copying cards, and simply changing the names/artwork.
If that is the only Magic patent, and we know you cannot copyright game mechanics, then how would Hasbro have a prayer of winning this lawsuit?That definition of "copied" has no hope of winning anything. Which is a good thing, because being able to copyright 'a unit with 2 attack' would be unbelievably stupid and disruptive.
The actual patent for MTG ishereand is actually pretty well written, specific and descriptive, which I suspect they now regret, given that would be the only reason every other TCG have been avoiding it by renaming things for the last x years.
From a common sense perspective, it's obvious that Hex blatantly ripped off Magic - from a legal perspective it's a good deal murkier.
Also,Angel of Dawnis way better than Serra Angel ! ;p
So if wizards wins this case do the people who payed big bucks to back this getting fucked right in the ass?Well this is probably a defining case. If Crypto wins the floodgates open if not..
In the meantime Hex is in limbo for probably a year or more.
Yes, this. They don't expect to win, just to drain crypto dry. Them going out of business is a win for them anyway.Maybe they know they are unlikely to win their lawsuit, but intend to make Hex waste some of their funding in legal battles, instead of putting it into further development? That's the kind of stuff you see on TV, but I have no idea if that's an actual thing IRL.