They wouldn't be having this dog and pony show if any of that were true.
Pretty sure that impeachment is exactly what the Congress would be doing in the case of evidence that the president was using US taxpayer dollars to extort campaign favors from foreign agents that help him politically
As I said, there are none so blind as those willfully refusing to see.
It isn't a dog and pony show at all. They are following the rules and process laid out by Republicans over the past 20 years, including the Clinton impeachment trial.
When you have facts, pound facts
When you have process, pound process
When you have neither pound the table and do your best to convince everyone the whole things a farce.
It isn't working though. And the pro Trump side are just digging the hole deeper by the day.
Y'all go ahead and doubt me. Press X to doubt. Please do. I dont' care. I'm saying this because I believe it to be true, and the willful denials around here are getting silly.
I heard from a whistleblower you secretly went to a Southern States convention to represent the great state of Kentucky and were greeted with open arms and gave a rousing keynote speech while wearing confederate gear and drinking Zima.
I'll hand you a list of allowable witnesses to refute this in a week or so.
The whistleblower's story is irrelevant at this point. There are multiple first hand witnesses testifying this week. This is a terrible place to hang your hat, because as soon as someone with first hand knowledge of the phone call speaks, this line of reasoning is done.
Yall are better off trying to argue it doesn't matter because we have no standards any more than trying to argue that the testimony doesn't include first hand accounts.
Not that it matters. Again: Clinton was impeached based on hearsay evidence from Linda Tripp. End of story.