Hodj Proved Salty: A Tranny's Victory Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
trumps such an omnipotent mad king a simple phone call doing his legal duties threatens to impeach him lawl

The rule of Law is supreme in this land

Extorting personal political favors from foreign governments in exchange for military assistance already allotted to them by Congress, the holders of the nation's purse strings, is not doing his legal duties. Its the polar opposite of that. You're literally arguing black is white and white is black and up is down and down is up.

And you still think you're not a part of a cult

Yes, making an extortion claim on a phone call is impeachable behavior. Lying about a blowjob under oath in a civil trial for a business deal gone sideways is impeachable, then this is 100 times more impeachable than that in scope and scale and only a dishonest person or an incredibly stupid one would argue otherwise.

fucking deal with it dude the problem here is you, your complete lack of basic decency, and sense of duty to your nation and your failures in your core ethical foundations, not mine
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
there's such mindless devotion displayed by nation to dear leader like mao or stalin that a large plurality openly rebel in insidious flatuluence constantly. when I read about fascist or totalitarian regimes they always seemed to kill people who dissented so nobody ever saw them, that's how you know trumps a fascists he makes it so nobody can dissent him...
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
And if you actually read up on how these cults function, there are still people who weren't at the Waco compound and who survived Jonestown who still think David Koresh and Jim Jones were prophets

There's this phenomena in cult psychology that causes that and causes cult members to reform their beliefs after they are disconfirmed in order to continue to justify them.

You are all in deep deep need of cult deprogramming

See, Hodj knows I've been calling SJWs a cult for years. Interesting he's worked it into his troll here.

But see, the difference is, cult members would NEVER offer to engage others in a debate. They will preach, sure. They will proselytize endlessly. But they won't engage. Wait a second, who in this thread keeps saying there is no conversation or debate here and he's just going to assert what he knows regardless of responses?

Hmmm.

And don't bother responding because none of the forked tongued mealy mouthed willful idiocy you'll throw up to try and refute that claim matters to me because the grass is fucking green.


Even references to biblical revelations about the deception of snakes--its a common cult device to keep people from engaging, snakes have a biological fear trigger to prevent dumb monkey's from getting eaten.

Poor Hodj. Buddy...we're here for you, if you can find the strength to break free. You don't just have to project you insecurities, you can once more be a skeptic!
 
  • 1Potato
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
"I have nothing let's bring up Mao or some shit"

The issue here is a problem with your core ethics and values, not mine.

You are the degenerate broken one arguing for the dissolution of law in favor of a dictator here.

Not me.

All I want is our presidents to not brazenly commit impeachable offenses while engaging in foreign relations with critical allies and be held up to a standard that has been set in stone for centuries and is the rule of law in this nation.

I'm not the enemy here. Y'all are.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
The rule of Law is supreme in this land

Extorting personal political favors from foreign governments in exchange for military assistance already allotted to them by Congress, the holders of the nation's purse strings, is not doing his legal duties. Its the polar opposite of that. You're literally arguing black is white and white is black and up is down and down is up.

And you still think you're not a part of a cult

Yes, making an extortion claim on a phone call is impeachable behavior. Lying about a blowjob under oath in a civil trial for a business deal gone sideways is impeachable, then this is 100 times more impeachable than that in scope and scale and only a dishonest person or an incredibly stupid one would argue otherwise.

fucking deal with it dude the problem here is you, your complete lack of basic decency, and sense of duty to your nation and your failures in your core ethical foundations, not mine

you can't have it both ways, he's clearly not a tyrant and as insane as I think the dems are they're not obstructed in doing what they are doing, what they are doing though is failing to persuade the persuadable middle and moderates who have clearly reejected these hearings as the political farce any reasonable and unbiased mind can clearly see they are
 
  • 1Potato
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
"I have nothing let's bring up Mao or some shit"

you literally just brought up king george and cults of personality (the most famous in history are stalin and mao) if bringing up this stuff "out of the blue" as evidence that you lost the argument you just invalidated yourself
 
  • 1Potato
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
as I think the dems are they're not obstructed in doing what they are doing

He literally won't let people in his administration testify and he's citing authorities he doesn't have to justify that

hat they are doing though is failing to persuade the persuadable middle

This is comletely lacking in awareness of the polling data.

He's been at 42% approval from the start of this for months. The approval for his impeachment is up too according to polls today.

You're literally engaging in fiction construction trying to convince no one else but yourself that its okay.

Cause you ain't convincing me.

I really want you all to get this: I view you and your arguments as no different from the thousands of theists I've argued with about things like evolution. The facts of this situation are as clear as descent with modification is in science. To deny them is only to expose yourself as dishonest or delusional.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
Sperge A: spams "orange man bad dictator, tyrant, king, cult of personality leader ect"

Person B: responds "if you want to compare to mao then what about this

Sperge A: haha clearly anyone who brings up old shit like mao is a dum dum who can't argue

person B: wtf? do you have 0 self awareness?
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
The rule of Law is supreme in this land

Extorting personal political favors from foreign governments in exchange for military assistance already allotted to them by Congress, the holders of the nation's purse strings, is not doing his legal duties. Its the polar opposite of that. You're literally arguing black is white and white is black and up is down and down is up.

And you still think you're not a part of a cult

Yes, making an extortion claim on a phone call is impeachable behavior. Lying about a blowjob under oath in a civil trial for a business deal gone sideways is impeachable, then this is 100 times more impeachable than that in scope and scale and only a dishonest person or an incredibly stupid one would argue otherwise.

fucking deal with it dude the problem here is you, your complete lack of basic decency, and sense of duty to your nation and your failures in your core ethical foundations, not mine

The President is free to withhold foreign aid even allotted by Congress. He can't spend it elsewhere, but he can withhold it. Its his article 2 power to do so. So lets be clear here. You feel the real crime is the favor asked for was PERSONAL.

Why do you believe asking for corruption to investigated is personal? Is it because the President stood to gain from the investigation? If its considered corruption because you gain from an investigation, then why was this not the stance when Obama began investigated Trump during the election?

So weird. Its almost like these standards are not objectively applied. (Not to mention the long history of American President's literally pushing for everything from investigations to fucking death squads in Vietnam, South America, Iran, Ukraine ect. Derp derp derp. But I'm sure you have a LARGE repository of precedence on the normal behavior of a President on a foreign phone call, right? Heard many of them Hodji?_)
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
"Why won't you let me distract to some dumb shit?"

Well in part because I don't read most of your posts or anyone's and because its a waste of time. You want us hunting down retard rabbit holes and it upsets you that I just cut that shit right off at the pass.

There is one issue and one issue only here: Do you think the President should be subservient to the law or do you think the President should be the law.

I'm a conservative republican. I believe in the Constitution. I believe in and love this nation and I understand its history and we are not North Korea or Communist China where the leader and the nation are one. We are not Cuba, where Fidel and Cuba were one.

Our president represents us on the world stage. He is not the nation. His will is not the will of the nation. They are not one creature.

And if you disagree with that, you are disagreeing with what America is and stands for and you have no power here.
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
There is one issue and one issue only here: Do you think the President should be subservient to the law or do you think the President should be the law.

I'm gonna go with the president should follow the law enacted by congress to make sure there's no corruption in ukraine especially after we just lost like a billion dollars to corrupt gangsters who stole the money
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
What I see is the GOP became so enamored with trying to hurt the libs, which is fine, that party politics, hurt one another, fight, battle it out in the arena of ideas and in the minds and hearts of voters, but they became so enamored with it, that when this idiot took control of the party, they became egotistically invested in protecting their brand, but their brand was consumed by his brand, so now they're just egotistically driven to defend him at all costs in some desperate bid to win.

There are times, and I really do mean this, when country must come before party.

When your president is brazenly committing crimes, driving top advisors away, isolating himself in his private quarters, can barely formulate a cogent sentence and is obviously unstable, that is one of those times.

This guy has access to the nuclear codes. He's already proven he can just up and decide to do something, order it, and no matter the consequences or forethought put into it, demand it gets done.

You all really have no idea how serious this is if you don't grasp why this guy isn't fit to lead
 

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
There is one issue and one issue only here: Do you think the President should be subservient to the law or do you think the President should be the law.

I'm a conservative republican. I believe in the Constitution. I believe in and love this nation and I understand its history and we are not North Korea or Communist China where the leader and the nation are one. We are not Cuba, where Fidel and Cuba were one.

Our president represents us on the world stage. He is not the nation. His will is not the will of the nation. They are not one creature.

And if you disagree with that, you are disagreeing with what America is and stands for and you have no power here.

Subservient, of course. The disagreement is a matter of legal interpretation, which are matters lawyers disagree on constantly. So we must draw on Precedence. Now, have administrations in the past asked foreign governments to change investigations? Well yes, you have Biden literally bragging about it.

Does the President have a legal right to ask Ukraine for investigations? Why yes, Congress has a treaty with Ukraine not only allowing this but OBLIGATING him to investigate potential corruption. Which of course is the basis for the Obama WH actions. So weird Hodj doesn't think this rule of law applies to Trump!

www.png


So which of your conservotard "rule of law" talking points believes justice is best done by abrogating the rule of law because you feel orange man bad? So much for your principles, you didn't even care enough to study what was the fucking law and what wasn't, you simply "listened and believed" your cultish campus friends.

https://www.congress.gov/106/cdoc/tdoc16/CDOC-106tdoc16.pdf
 

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
This guy has access to the nuclear codes. He's already proven he can just up and decide to do something, order it, and no matter the consequences or forethought put into it, demand it gets done.

You all really have no idea how serious this is if you don't grasp why this guy isn't fit to lead

jesus if there was ever a more clear sign that hodj is in the grips of a hysterical meltdown the nuclear codes? lawl, yeah trumps gonna launch the nukes the second he thinks he wants his kids and grandkids to die in a nuclear winter.
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036

yeah lemme tell you how thrilled independents are by everything they've seen

No man, its popular calling a standard action performed by every President illegal. People enjoy that.

I mean, people in the cult do. Not so much normal folks who won't believe we've always been at war with Eastasia because the same guys who told us Iraq has yellowcake and WMDs really insist we should believe it.
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377

yeah lemme tell you how thrilled independents are by everything they've seen

His approval rating is 42%. Disapproval at 53%. Has been for months. Minus a little blip or two for well over a year. People may not support impeachment because they feel its divisive, but they don't approve, they don't agree with it, and they're planning for the voting booth solution. They are obviously ready for an end to the drama and the chaos.
 

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
K and there will be a vote in 2020 and if Trump loses (he won't) then he loses.

YOU are the one talking like he's a dictator... what the fuck is broken in your brain Johnny Sack?

Here, just throwing this in your lap for you to debunk since you're clearly in the autistic mood.
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,036
When your president is brazenly committing crimes, driving top advisors away, isolating himself in his private quarters, can barely formulate a cogent sentence and is obviously unstable, that is one of those times.

Every witness said they had no evidence of a crime being committed. Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. They could impeach the President because they believe his Orange hair is stupid. You know nothing about this process, you're attempting to hide behind ideological talking points and emotional "FEELS">


"OH NOES, THINK OF THE CHILDREN AND NUCLEAR WINTER"--god damn, how far you have fallen.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user