Hodj Proved Salty: A Tranny's Victory Thread

This is an example of how these idiots will post something on twitter, it'll bounce around, they'll post about it, believe it, call it contradictory evidence, when its nothing more than misleading lies.

We have the GOP requested witness get up there and testify under oath this is an non credible conspiracy theory. They didn't like that, so after the fact they realized his testimony hurt their case, so they seek to discredit him through slander and lies.

Its an atrocity. Anyone honest should be appalled by the venal gross blatantness of it. These people don't even have the tact to try and hide it. They do it blatantly, then pretend I'm the one being close minded by....taking credible witness testimony made under oath credibly and not taking their conspiracy theories shat out from twitter by Russian bots and right wing black helicopter hacks seriously.

You want me to take someone on Trump's side seriously? That's what I'm doing when I take Volker's testimony credibly. There's about 10 more people who could testify under oath in defense of Trump, who I would take seriously, if they testified under oath.

But they won't because Trump won't let them because he knows they won't be able to lie to protect him under oath.

That's the end of this debate. What a dishonest @Dom mischaracterization of what is going on here. Really.

I dont owe bad faith trolls shit and especially not giving their refuted conspiracy theories the time of day.

Dom said:

I'm not going to get dragged into the argument. I meant what I said, and it still stands. Several times in the past 50 pages, you've turned to the same finger-in-ear attitude that religious fanatics do. One of I'm right, you're wrong, and nothing you can say will change that. I'm not listening I'm not listening I'm not listening!

You know me, I really don't care about the topic at hand. It's just humorous to me to see an atheist do this sort of thing, thus the comment.

Click to expand...

Several times in the past 50 pages I've cut off someone asserting a claim that's already been refuted by more credible people and told them they're wasting their time.

You're wrong, and whether you care about it or not, I do care about the facts and the truth, and I do care to cut off this shit at the pass and not waste my time giving it the credibility of re investigating endlessly something that's already been proven, to the hilt, to my satisfaction.

I have done my research. I reject their absurd claim Biden was working in Ukraine to help Burisma for his son. That's a non credible conspiracy theory fed to Trump by Giuliana, that even John Bolton said was going to blow up and turn into this shit storm and here we are.

I am right on the facts, whether you or they want to admit it or accept it or not. We have credible claims and non credible flak and mud being thrown to distort and my refusal to let them distort and throw flak is not me acting like a religious person.

Its me rejecting already refuted claims by religious people and not giving them the time of day.

You know as well as I that they will endlessly repeat this "Well why don't you want Biden investigated then?" bullshit when the reason I don't care about that is because its already been discounted as non credible by credible witnesses whom the white house itself called to testify in the case.

And you fucking know what I'm saying is true. I do not owe someone who thinks the Earth is flat an endless amount of time for them to repeat blatant distortions of evidence to justify their whackadoodle conspiracy theories.

Me: Examines all the evidence beforehand, watches the under oath testimony in total, reads the transcript put forward by the White House, watches the White House Chief of Staff admit to the crime, watches the White House requested witnesses discount the White House's own conspiracy theory\
Them: WHY WONT YOU CONSIDER THIS NONCREDIBLE CLAIM THATS ALREADY BEEN REFUTED THATS BEEN SHOWN TO HAVE NO MERIT?
Dom: Your refusal to consider said non credible claim thats already been refuted thats been shown to have no merit means you, an atheist, are acting like a religious person
Me: That's fucking retarded and you know it

I know you to be a better, more honest, person than that @Dom

And you know me to be more level headed than I come across.

And I do my research. I do my homework. So when I've made up my mind based on the facts as I see it, I don't owe fucking personality cult troll gang bangs any of my time. The amount of time I've given them is already more than they deserve or merit for this nonsense.

For the record: Biden was in Ukraine on official state business, asking them Ukrainians to remove a prosecutor who refused to do his job prosecuting corruption in the nation. Biden's request was at the behest of our state, and several EU partners. The removal of said prosecutor hurt Burisma, by cracking down on corruption the company was involved in, that Biden's son had nothing to do with.

It is 100% a giant ball of shit filled smoke they're blowing trying to make it seem like what Trump did was "no big deal, hey, its basically the same thing Biden was doing there"

That's a crap argument I reject roundly and don't owe a single fucking second of my time to.

Me rejecting that has everything to do with me understanding what sound evidence is versus what bad evidence is, as well as my own conclusions based on my own examination of the evidence.

There's no debate to be had on the subject because its like someone telling me the sky is green rather than blue and the grass is purple rather than green.

I do not owe them shit.

• A Ukrainian gas company with ties to former Vice President Joe Biden's son is at the center of a complicated scandal involving a whistleblower complaint that's linked to President Donald Trump and a conversation he had with Ukraine's president.
• Biden's son, Hunter Biden, began working for Burisma Holdings in 2014.
• This was around the same time the former vice president was spearheading the Obama administration's efforts to pressure Ukraine to root out corruption.
• Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani have suggested, without evidence, that Biden improperly pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who had at one point been investigating Burisma Holdings.
• Though some ethics watchdogs have criticized Hunter's decision to work for Burisma in light of who his father is, there's no evidence of wrongdoing on his part or the former vice president's.
• And there's nothing concrete to support the suggestion Biden pressured Ukraine to take actions to the benefit of his son.
• Meanwhile, the whistleblower complaint and ensuing scandal have sparked an impeachment inquiry into Trump.