Hodj Proved Salty: A Tranny's Victory Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
there's two factions over there and they fight, in this case there's two prosecutors, leshenko and lutsenko, leshenko publically stated he hated trump and was convicted in a ukranian court for meddling in US election. volker was listening to leshenko on that specific topic, I trust neither want investigation.
Click to expand...

Except they did investigate Burisma, once the corrupt prosecutor was removed and the company was fined.

You're an idiot. Everyone in this community knows you're rubbing one stick together with air trying to start a fire, you aren't credible nothing you say is credible. Try again.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
oh but the denied witnesses you don't want to hear from them, just the ones you can potentially trap sophistry grade d+
Click to expand...

I can only go on what is entered into the official record and really don't care about your conspiracy theories. There are multiple White House officials stone walling subpoenas, I'm far more worried about what they have to say and refuse to under oath than people determined by the investigative committees to be non credible
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
hodj said:
Except they did investigate Burisma, once the corrupt prosecutor was removed and the company was fined.
Click to expand...

They just did that this year, I wonder what happened this year that prompted that action. also why where the cases shut down to begin with when shokin was verifiably persuing burisma (and privat bank the real target of corruption) before he was fired
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
hodj said:
I can only go on what is entered into the official record and really don't care about your conspiracy theories. There are multiple White House officials stone walling subpoenas, I'm far more worried about what they have to say and refuse to under oath than people determined by the investigative committees to be non credible
Click to expand...

when they vote for a real impeachment and not a fake one then they can bypass executive privilege and not this kangaroo court we have now.
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
hodj said:
This is a non sequitur
Click to expand...

directly relevent to style of debate you are using right now, witness testimony without physical evidence leads to witch trials like in salem
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Notice how they refuse to address the substance here

Its all flak

"What about biden? What about people the committee refused to subpoena? Ignore the multiple witnesses we're telling to refuse subpoenas"

It all boils down to the fact that they cannot, will not, answer this simple question:

"Do you think it is okay for the President to use US taxpayer dollars to solicit personal political favors from foreign leaders in order to influence our domestic elections, to the President's benefit and no other?"
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
when they vote for a real impeachment and not a fake one then they can bypass executive privilege and not this kangaroo court we have now.
Click to expand...

Slander in place of substance

fanaskin said:
directly relevent to style of debate you are using right now, witness testimony without physical evidence leads to witch trials like in salem
Click to expand...

False. It does not follow. Volker is stating a conclusion made not just by him but multiple people involved in the Ukrainian foreign policy initiatives, and his opinion is corroborated by multiple avenues, including a complete lack of any evidence to justify the assertion of corruption and copious evidence that what Biden did in the Ukraine was completely legitimate, legal, valid and a part of legitimate US foreign policy

God is a fiction invented with no justification, devoid of evidence, with no credible witnesses to attest to his existence, and no credible evidence to justify the claim.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
>kangaroo court

Literally following rules and guidelines set up by Republicans during the Clinton impeachment hearings.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
You got nothing.

NOTHING

And it shows.

Its such a simple question to answer: No, the president should not be using foreign aid to extort personal political favors from foreign entities that have no national security or other domestic interest beyond helping his political campaign

Its a violation of campaign finance, its a violation of the public trust, its a high crime, its an impeachable offense and there is nothing you can say or do to change that so let's talk about Biden's already refuted charge for 100 hours to avoid answering that simple fucking question
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
When you grow a fucking ounce, a shred, of integrity, fanaskin et al

You let me fucking know
 
  • 1Hodjing
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
hodj said:
"Do you think it is okay for the President to use US taxpayer dollars to solicit personal political favors from foreign leaders in order to influence our domestic elections, to the President's benefit and no other?"
Click to expand...

misleading statement that is not neutral and presumes an answer that also requires mindreading on your part, evidence also suggests legitimate reason to look into corruption in persuit of lost US taxpayer dollars, previous regimes public servants heavily involved in area at time, it's in the national interest. sophistry grade C
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,399
hodj said:
When you grow a fucking ounce, a shred, of integrity, fanaskin et al

You let me fucking know
Click to expand...

I have yet to see integrity in you so why should I think you're some kind of expert who knows what you're talking about there?
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
ZyyzYzzy

ZyyzYzzy

RIP USA
<Banned>
25,295
48,789
Since Biden is a politic rival, he cant be investigated for corruption even though the man has only ever been an elected official with known salaries, yet he is worth ~10M
 
  • 1Potato
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Its like arguing with creationists he makes 10 false claims in three lines

>misleading statement that is not neutral and presumes an answer that also requires mindreading on your part,

The White House's own released transcript shows this no mind reading required their efforts to hide it after the fact and distract also demonstrate they know what they did is wrong

No mind reading necessary. False statement 1 in the gish gallop

>evidence also suggests legitimate reason to look into corruption in persuit of lost US taxpayer dollars

False again. No evidence to date demonstrates that what Biden did in the Ukraine was under the table or shady in any way. You're conflating potentially investigating other cases of corruption with Biden, as a way to distract from Trump

False statement #2 in the gish gallop

>previous regimes public servants heavily involved in area at time, it's in the national interest.

Whats in the national interest is that our President doesn't use US taxpayer dollars to influence domestic elections via soliciting foreign interference

False statement #3 in the gish gallop

fanaskin said:
I have yet to see integrity in you so why should I think you're some kind of expert who knows what you're talking about there?
Click to expand...

People without integrity tend to not be able to see it in the people who have it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.