Hodj Proved Salty: A Tranny's Victory Thread

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
ZyyzYzzy said:
Since Biden is a politic rival, he cant be investigated for corruption even though the man has only ever been an elected official with known salaries, yet he is worth ~10M
Click to expand...

If there was any evidence whatsoever that was found credible and people were willing to testify under oath to its existence, I would be for investigating Biden

Since this is not the case, and everyone not in the Trump bubble find the accusations non credible, to have come from Giuliani and his indicted co conspirators and nowhere else, the insistence by the Trump bubble to investigate Biden is a clear distraction fallacy meant to keep the morons on the reservation

You're not here to convince me. You're here to convince you.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Ultimately your assertion I think Biden should be like immune to investigation is false.

You're predicating the investigation on conspiracy theories and snipe hunts and using it to distract from the actual, salient issues

That is why I disregard the charge and do not find it credible
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj said:
If there was any evidence whatsoever that was found credible and people were willing to testify under oath to its existence, I would be for investigating Biden
Click to expand...

also hodj: " I don't care if the people that would testify to this effect are barred by democrats from testifying"
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
also hodj: " I don't care if the people that would testify to this effect are barred by democrats from testifying"
Click to expand...

Wishful thinking

You have multiple subpoena'd witnesses who could testify under oath but are refusing to who could support your charge but Trump won't let them.

The only people trying to hide anything here are the Trump circle
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj said:
Ultimately your assertion I think Biden should be like immune to investigation is false.
Click to expand...

says the guy who just spent 10 pages sperging out that investigating corruption involving biden is wrong
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
If your response to the question "Should the president be allowed to use taxpayer dollars in an extortion scheme to influence a domestic election via foreign interference" is "But what about" -ism in any other direction, you're a dishonest dissembler and don't care about the truth

I care abou the truth. A lot. I care so much that I want to believe as many true things as possible, and I work diligently to disbelieve as many false things as possible and I disbelieve your claim because all evidence indicates its garbage

More likely to happen, since it already has multiple times, is that these so called witnesses not allowed to testify would end up solidifying the case against Trump, as did both witnesses the White House did allow to speak when the time came to testify.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Now without citing testimony that doesn't exist that you think could exist if only X Y Z happened

Answer the fucking question

"Is it acceptable behavior for any politician to use taxpayer dollars to extort personal political favors in the form of interference with a domestic political campaign, in order to solely benefit the politician and with absolutely no national security or other interests at stake"

Yes or no

No "But what about" -isms
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj said:
As for corruption in dealing with the Ukrainians

www.reuters.com

Exclusive: Trump lawyer Giuliani was paid $500,000 to consult on indicted associate's firm

President Donald Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, was paid $500,000 for work he did for a company co-founded by the Ukrainian-American businessman arrested last week on campaign finance charges, Giuliani told Reuters on Monday.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Click to expand...

what did being paid for a service corrupt again? what did they get in return that made it corrupt?
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
what did being paid for a service corrupt again? what did they get in return that made it corrupt?
Click to expand...

See?

They literally do not care about facts. They are going to try to excuse literally anything and everything that this team of corrupt criminals does, while pointing to imaginative fictions invented whole cloth and asserted without evidence

Its a fucking cult.
 
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj said:
Chasing snipes to justify ignoring actual corruption is, in fact, wrong.

You fucking retard
Click to expand...

you sure seem to get really mad when people suggest investigating what a public official did who also helped the cia engineer a regime change with nazi militia's nothing irregular about that
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj said:
See?

They literally do not care about facts. They are going to try to excuse literally anything and everything that this team of corrupt criminals does, while pointing to imaginative fictions invented whole cloth and asserted without evidence

Its a fucking cult.
Click to expand...

asking you for facts is not evidence of not caring about facts, it's the opposite, i'm asking for more facts, what is the charge I can't figure it out based on information provided, what is the corruption?

just cause you throw around a word doesn't mean you justified the use of the word, i'm asking you to finish the thought you put out there.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
you sure seem to get really mad when people suggest investigating what a public official did who also helped the cia engineer a regime change with nazi militia's nothing irregular about that
Click to expand...

Righteous anger at injustice and blatant fraudulent lying and sycophantic behavior is justified

Try again
 
Vanessa

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
What's the difference between words words words in 5 autist posts in a row versus 1 post that is Vanessa/Lithose length?

Answer: NOTHING, you projecting fuckface.
 
  • 1Potato
Reactions: 1 user
fanaskin

fanaskin

Well known agitator
<Silver Donator>
55,945
138,398
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
fanaskin said:
headline indicates there was no business done, guiliani was corrupt because he provided to service to one client while doing nothing with another one?
Click to expand...

"Its okay he stopped doing it when shit hit the fan and he got caught"

Attempted murder is still murder

Attempted bribery and corruption is still bribery and corruption

But again I say

hodj said:
See?

They literally do not care about facts. They are going to try to excuse literally anything and everything that this team of corrupt criminals does, while pointing to imaginative fictions invented whole cloth and asserted without evidence

Its a fucking cult.
Click to expand...
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Vanessa said:
What's the difference between words words words in 5 autist posts in a row versus 1 post that is Vanessa/Lithose length?

Answer: NOTHING, you projecting fuckface.
Click to expand...

This dumb bitch is like 50 pages back still its hilarious watching him like a little fucking poodle nipping at the heels
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
And the funniest part of all your insipid, boot licking, retard arguments, Fana, is the implication that somehow, even if what Biden did was suspect, that it in any way compares to the level of corruption of withholding us military aid that is a significant portion of that nation's budget in order to extort a personal political favor from their president in order to help in a domestic political campaign

Its apples and oranges, even if the charges were true, the scope and scale radically vastly and more threatening to our democracy in the Trump situation than the Biden on, for which, again, no evidence exists.

Stupid fucking argument is stupid. It is obvious the only reason you want to argue it is to distract from Trump's actual, demonstrated, testified, and proven, misdeeds.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.